TRIZ에서 모순해결전략의 유형 및 적용
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 최성운 | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-28T11:43:24Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-02-12 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-6783 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/11215 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The study proposes multiple TRIZ contradiction solution strategies for addressing PC (Physical Contradiction) and TC (Technical Contradiction) by implementing TRIZ cause-and-effect tree. The problem associated with TC of the ends is solved by PC of means which employs a causal relationship between causes and effects. The TRIZ contradiction solution strategies demonstrated in this research are classified into 3 types of combined strategy as follows: 1. To-Be PC and AS-Is PC, 2.To-Be PC and As-Is TC, 3.As-Is PC and To-Be TC. The combined strategy of To-Be PC and As-Is PC is similar to a divide-and-conquer technique. This strategy adopts parallel strategies using 4 separation principles in time, in space, between parts and the whole, and upon condition of two reversed-PCs. Moreover, its application elucidates the conflict relationship of two TCs from the study. The integrated 4 separation principles and 40 inventive principles present an effective synergy effect from the combination, and further addresses the problems in the TRIZ contradiction resolution strategies. Combined strategy of To-Be PC and As-Is TC implements the 40 inventive principles that To-Be PC of the means resolves the As-Is TC of the ends. Combined strategy of As-Is PC and To-Be TC also uses inventive principles to the As-Is PC of the means to solve the To-Be TC of the ends. In addition, propositional and logical relationship of necessary and sufficient conditions between TC and PC is used to support the validity of 3 TRIZ contradiction solution strategies. In addition, 3 other strategies of necessary and sufficient conditions validate the contraposition relationship of the truth table. This study discusses TRIZ case studies from National Quality Circle Contest from the years between 2011 and 2014 to provide the usage guidelines of TRIZ contradiction solutions for quality purposes. Examining analysis from the case studies and investigating combined strategies allows the users to obtain comprehensive understanding. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 대한안전경영과학회 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 대한안전경영과학회지 | - |
dc.title | TRIZ에서 모순해결전략의 유형 및 적용 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Classifying and Implementing Different Types of Contradiction Resolution Strategies in TRIZ | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12812/ksms.2015.17.4.381 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 대한안전경영과학회지, v.17, no.4, pp.381 - 396 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002071775 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 396 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 381 | - |
dc.citation.title | 대한안전경영과학회지 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 17 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 최성운 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | TRIZ | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | PC | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | TC | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Casual Relationship | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Contradiction Solution Strategies | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 4 Seperation Principles | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 40 Inventive Principles | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Necessary and Sufficient Conditions | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Truth Table | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Case Studies | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.