Acupuncture for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors
- Kim, Kun Hyung; Kim, Tae-Hun; Lee, Byung Ryul; Kim, Jae Kyu; Son, Dong Wuk; Lee, Sang Weon; Yang, Gi Young
- Issue Date
- Oct-2013
- Publisher
- CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
- Keywords
- Acupuncture; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Systematic review; Complementary and alternative medicine
- Citation
- COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, v.21, no.5, pp.535 - 556
- Journal Title
- COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
- Volume
- 21
- Number
- 5
- Start Page
- 535
- End Page
- 556
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/14273
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.08.007
- ISSN
- 0965-2299
- Abstract
- Objectives: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) negatively affects patients' quality of life. No systematic review evaluating the effects and safety of acupuncture for this population is available. We aimed to evaluate evidence indicating the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for LSS. Methods: We searched five English-language databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and AMED) and one Chinese database (CAJ) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of needle acupuncture for LSS. CCTs were analyzed only in terms of safety and intervention-related information. Results: Six RCTs (n = 582) and six CCTs, which were all from China and reported in Chinese, were included. High or uncertain risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity due to different acupuncture techniques were observed. All RCTs compared different combinations or techniques of acupuncture. None of the included studies mentioned safety issues. Acupuncture combined with other interventions and/or with additional stimulation increased the number of improved patients compared with acupuncture alone or relatively simpler stimulation (n = 582; relative risk, 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.25). Pain intensity, overall symptoms, and functional outcomes related to LSS and quality of life showed significantly favourable improvement in the treatment group compared with the control group, which lasted for up to 6 months post-treatment. Conclusions: We found no conclusive evidence of the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for LSS because of high or uncertain risk of bias and the limited generalisability of the included studies. Future trials using rigorous methodology, appropriate comparisons and clinically relevant outcomes should be conducted. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.