Detailed Information

Cited 39 time in webofscience Cited 42 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Differential metabolic effects of rosuvastatin and pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients

Authors
Koh, Kwang KonQuon, Michael J.Sakuma, IchiroHan, Seung HwanChoi, HanulLee, KyounghoonShin, Eak Kyun
Issue Date
20-Jun-2013
Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Keywords
Statins; Adiponectin; Glycated hemoglobin; Insulin resistance; Endothelial function
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, v.166, no.2, pp.509 - 515
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume
166
Number
2
Start Page
509
End Page
515
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/14469
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.028
ISSN
0167-5273
Abstract
Background: Rosuvastatin and pravastatin have differential hydrophilicity and potency to inhibit hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase that may be relevant to changes in adiponectin levels, insulin resistance, and the rate of new onset diabetes in large clinical studies. Therefore, we hypothesized that rosuvastatin and pravastatin may have differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients. Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Age, gender, and body mass index were matched. Fifty-four patients were given placebo, rosuvastatin 10 mg, or pravastatin 40 mg, respectively once daily for 2 months. Results: When compared with pravastatin therapy, rosuvastatin therapy significantly reduced total, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels (P<0.05 by post-hoc comparison), but comparably improved flow-mediated dilation after 2 months. Interestingly, rosuvastatin therapy significantly increased fasting insulin (mean % changes; 28%, P=0.005). and HbA1c (1%, P=0.038) while decreasing plasma adiponectin levels (9%, P=0.010) and insulin sensitivity (assessed by QUICKI; 2%, P=0.007) when compared with baseline. By contrast, pravastatin therapy significantly decreased fasting insulin (8%, P=0.042), and HbA1c levels (1%, P=0.019) while increasing plasma adiponectin levels (36%, P=0.006) and insulin sensitivity (3%, P=0.005) when compared with baseline. Moreover, these differential effects were evident when outcomes of rosuvastatin and pravastatin therapy were directly compared (P=0.002 for insulin levels by ANOVA on Ranks, P=0.003 for adiponectin, P=0.003 for QUICKI, and P=0.010 for HbA1c by ANOVA). Conclusions: While significantly reducing lipoprotein profiles, rosuvastatin therapy had unwanted metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients when compared with pravastatin therapy, that may be clinically relevant in patients prone to metabolic diseases. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Kyoung Hoon photo

Lee, Kyoung Hoon
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE