Femoral Tunnel Position on Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Men: Transtibial Technique Versus Anteromedial Portal Technique
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Noh, Jung Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Roh, Young Hak | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Bo Gyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yi, Seung Rim | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sung Yup | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-28T23:46:43Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-02-13 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-05 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0749-8063 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/14547 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a free Achilles tendon allograft using either a transtibial or an anteromedial portal technique and then to quantify the difference in femoral tunnel position between these 2 approaches. This assessment was to be performed with a new method using conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a digital imaging system. Methods: In this prospective randomized comparative study, 53 young male patients with ACL rupture underwent ACL reconstruction with the transtibial technique (group 1) or the anteromedial portal technique (group 2). We assessed clinical outcomes with the Lachman test, pivot shift test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) classification, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and single leg hop (SLH) test. Radiologic assessments included the position of the femoral tunnel aperture and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) index on conventional MRI and the side-to-side difference (SSD) on stress radiographs. Results: Sixty-one participants had follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 30.2 months. At the last follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in results from the Lachman test, pivot shift test, IKDC classification, Tegner activity scale, and SLH test. The Lysholm score and SSD results in group 2 were superior to those in group 1 (P < .001). The femoral tunnel aperture was positioned more posteriorly in group 2 than in group 1 (P < .001). Changes in the PCL index were greater in group 1 than in group 2 (P < .001). Conclusions: The position of the femoral tunnel aperture created with the anteromedial portal technique was more posterior than that made with the transtibial technique. Knees reconstructed with the anteromedial portal technique were more stable in Telos testing, and were 3 points higher on the Lysholm score. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the Tegner activity scale or IKDC classification between the 2 groups. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level I, randomized controlled clinical trial. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY | - |
dc.subject | ACL RECONSTRUCTION | - |
dc.subject | GRAFT OBLIQUITY | - |
dc.subject | CORONAL PLANE | - |
dc.subject | TIBIAL TUNNEL | - |
dc.subject | KNEE LAXITY | - |
dc.subject | OUTSIDE-IN | - |
dc.subject | PLACEMENT | - |
dc.subject | LENGTH | - |
dc.subject | ANGLE | - |
dc.title | Femoral Tunnel Position on Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Men: Transtibial Technique Versus Anteromedial Portal Technique | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000319038900013 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.025 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, v.29, no.5, pp.882 - 890 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84876928469 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 890 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 882 | - |
dc.citation.title | ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 29 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Roh, Young Hak | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ACL RECONSTRUCTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | GRAFT OBLIQUITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CORONAL PLANE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TIBIAL TUNNEL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | KNEE LAXITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OUTSIDE-IN | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PLACEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LENGTH | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANGLE | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Orthopedics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Sport Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Orthopedics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Sport Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.