Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Cohort Study with a Five-Year Follow-Up
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ahn, Yong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Keum, Han Joong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Sang Ha | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-06T06:39:07Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-04-02 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0383 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/26142 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) is an effective minimally invasive surgery for soft cervical disc herniation in properly selected cases. The current gold standard is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, few studies have evaluated the outcome of PECD compared with ACDF. We compared the surgical results of PECD and ACDF. Data from patients treated with single-level PECD (n = 51) or ACDF (n = 64) were analyzed. Patients were prospectively entered into the clinical database and their records were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative data and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and modified Macnab criteria. VAS and NDI results significantly improved in both groups. The rates of excellent or good results were 88.24% and 90.63% in the PECD and ACDF group, respectively. The revision rates were 3.92% and 1.56% in the PECD and ACDF group, respectively. Operative time, hospital stay, and time to return to work were reduced in the PECD group compared to the ACDF group (p < 0.001). The five-year outcomes of PECD were comparable to those of conventional ACDF. PECD provided the typical benefits of minimally invasive surgery and may be an effective alternative for treating soft cervical disc herniation. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE | - |
dc.title | Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Cohort Study with a Five-Year Follow-Up | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000518823000083 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jcm9020371 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, v.9, no.2 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85086468241 | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 9 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Ahn, Yong | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | anterior cervical | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cervical discectomy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | endoscopic | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | hospital stay | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | operative time | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | percutaneous | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | return to work | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LASER-DISC-DECOMPRESSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SPINE SURGERY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NUCLEOTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COMPLICATIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ADJACENT | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | General & Internal Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, General & Internal | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.