Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The selection of beta-blocker after successful reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Authors
Jang, Ho-JunSuh, JonKwon, Sung WooPark, Sang-DonOh, Pyung ChunMoon, JeonggeunLee, KyounghoonKang, Woong CholJung, In HyunAn, HyongginKim, Tae-Noon
Issue Date
May-2020
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction; beta-blocker; primary percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis; coronary reperfusion
Citation
PERFUSION-UK, v.35, no.4, pp.338 - 347
Journal Title
PERFUSION-UK
Volume
35
Number
4
Start Page
338
End Page
347
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/2936
DOI
10.1177/0267659119878396
ISSN
0267-6591
Abstract
Background: The selection of beta-blocker for survivors after primary intervention due to acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction seems crucial to improve the outcomes. However, rare comparison data existed for these patients. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of selective beta-blockers to that of carvedilol in patients treated with primary intervention. Methods and results: Among the 1,485 patients in the "INTERSTELLAR" registry between 2007 and 2015, 238 patients with selective beta-blockers (bisoprolol, nebivolol, atenolol, bevantolol, and betaxolol) and 988 with carvedilol were included and their clinical outcomes were compared for a 2-year observation period. In the clinical baseline characteristics, the unfavorable trends in the carvedilol group were high Killip presentation, lower ejection fractions, smaller diameters, and longer lengths of deployed stents. Although mortality (2.5% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.414) and the rate of stroke (0.8% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.693) were not different between groups, the rate of recurrent myocardial infarction (4.6% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.001) and of target vessel revascularization (4.2% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.001) were lower in the carvedilol group. After eliminating the difference by propensity matching, the similar outcome result was shown (all-cause death, 0.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.678; stroke, 0.6% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.479; myocardial infarction, 5.0% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.003; target vessel revascularization, 4.5% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.006) for 595 matched populations. The use of carvedilol was also determined to be an independent predictor for recurrent myocardial infarctions (hazard ratio = 0.305; p = 0.005; 95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.69). Conclusion: Use of a carvedilol in ST-segment myocardial infarction survivor is associated with lower recurrent myocardial infarction events. Thus, it might be the better choice of beta-blocker for secondary prevention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Moon, Jeong Keun photo

Moon, Jeong Keun
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE