Advantages of a Microsurgical Translaminar Approach (Keyhole Laminotomy) for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Son, Seong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sang Gu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Woo Kyung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ahn, Yong | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-27T08:42:09Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-02-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1878-8750 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/3102 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: To prevent risk of iatrogenic instability after surgery for upper lumbar disc herniation, we adapted a microsurgical translaminar approach (keyhole laminotomy), which allows less destructive laminotomy. We compared results of translaminar and interlaminar approaches. METHODS: The study enrolled 48 patients who underwent single-level discectomy in the upper lumbar spine (L1-2 or L2-3). Patients were allocated to 2 groups: a translaminar group (n = 20) or an interlaminar group in = 28). Mean patient age was 57.04 +/- 12.77 years, and median follow-up duration was 3.5 years (range, 1.0-7.0 years). Clinical and radiologic data were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, surgical level, and preoperative symptoms, were nonsignificantly different. At 1 year after surgery, improvement in leg pain as determined by visual analog scale was nonsignificantly different. Improvement in visual analog scale for back pain was significantly greater in the translaminar group compared with interlaminar group (mean 4.00 +/- 1.56 vs. 2.45 +/- 2.01, P < 0.001). Surgical outcome was not different between groups. Mean decrease in disc height at operated level was not significantly different between groups. Mean increase in segmental range of motion at surgical levels was significantly greater in the interlaminar group (-3.38 +/- 4.03 degrees vs. 1.10 +/- 3.03 degrees , P = 0.010), and mean recovery of total lumbar lordosis was significantly greater in the translaminar group (9.80 +/- 5.96 degrees vs. 0.43 +/- 8.45 degrees, P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The translaminar approach provides a safe and effective alternative to the classic interlaminar approach for upper lumbar disc herniation. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | WORLD NEUROSURGERY | - |
dc.title | Advantages of a Microsurgical Translaminar Approach (Keyhole Laminotomy) for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000447941300003 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.004 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | WORLD NEUROSURGERY, v.119, pp.E16 - E22 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85051668489 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | E22 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | E16 | - |
dc.citation.title | WORLD NEUROSURGERY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 119 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Son, Seong | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Sang Gu | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Woo Kyung | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Ahn, Yong | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Discectomy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Lumbar disc disease | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Microsurgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | POSTERIOR ASPECT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HIDDEN ZONE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SPINE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LOCATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ROOT | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Neurosciences & Neurology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Clinical Neurology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.