A new femoral fixation device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the outside-in technique and hamstring tendon graft: A comparison between two devices in cadaveric human knee models
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chong, Suri | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwak, Dai-Soon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Balasubramanian, Dhanasekaraprabu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Song, Young Dong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Na, Young Gon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Tae Kyun | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-27T16:44:33Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-02-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0968-0160 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/5622 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: A new device (T-anchor) was developed for ACL reconstruction and is implanted via the outside-in technique using hamstring grafts. The purpose of this study was to compare the T-anchor with the EndoButton Direct. Methods: This study was conducted on 30 cadaveric knees (15 matched pairs). There were two groups of 15 each in the T-anchor and EndoButton Direct groups. After the harvest of grafts, fixation site profile and graft length were measured by loading the grafts onto both devices. They were then tested on a universal testing machine to assess elongation after cyclic loading, load to failure, ultimate load, and mode of failure. Results: The fixation site profile was lower in the T-anchor group than in the EndoButton Direct group (2.3 +/- 0.4 mm vs. 4.7 +/- 1.0 mm, P < 0.001). The length of the graft-device complex of the T-anchor specimens was longer than that of the EndoButton Direct specimens (125.0 +/- 8.9 mm vs. 115.0 +/- 8.7 mm, P < 0.001). The mean cyclic elongation was lower for the T-anchor group when compared with the EndoButton Direct group (2.4 +/- 0.6 mm vs. 3.9 +/- 2.6 mm, P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in ultimate load and load to failure between the T-anchor and EndoButton Direct groups. For mode of failure, the T-anchor fared better (P = 0.013) with all failures attributed to specimens. Conclusions: In this cadaveric study, the new device, T-anchor, performed better than the EndoButton Direct with respect to the above-mentioned study parameters except for ultimate load and load to failure. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | KNEE | - |
dc.subject | ACL RECONSTRUCTION | - |
dc.subject | PORTAL TECHNIQUE | - |
dc.subject | CURRENT TRENDS | - |
dc.subject | ENDOBUTTON | - |
dc.subject | TUNNEL | - |
dc.title | A new femoral fixation device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the outside-in technique and hamstring tendon graft: A comparison between two devices in cadaveric human knee models | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000412610900005 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.knee.2017.06.003 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | KNEE, v.24, no.5, pp.925 - 932 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85025171620 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 932 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 925 | - |
dc.citation.title | KNEE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 24 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Na, Young Gon | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ACL reconstruction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | New fixation device | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Outside-in technique | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | T-anchor | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | EndoButton Direct | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ACL RECONSTRUCTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PORTAL TECHNIQUE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CURRENT TRENDS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ENDOBUTTON | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TUNNEL | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Orthopedics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Sport Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Orthopedics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Sport Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.