Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sim, Jae-Ang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jong-Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sahnghoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bae, Ji-Yong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seon, Jong-Keun | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-27T19:41:17Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-02-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0942-2056 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/6243 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Although trans-portal and outside-in techniques are commonly used for anatomical ACL reconstruction, there is very little information on variability in tunnel placement between two techniques. A total of 103 patients who received ACL reconstruction using trans-portal (50 patients) and outside-in techniques (53 patients) were included in the study. The ACL tunnel location, length and graft-femoral tunnel angle were analyzed using the 3D CT knee models, and we compared the location and length of the femoral and tibial tunnels, and graft bending angle between the two techniques. The variability in each technique regarding the tunnel location, length and graft tunnel angle using the range values was also compared. There were no differences in the average of femoral tunnel depth and height between the two groups. The ranges of femoral tunnel depth and height showed no difference between two groups (36 and 41 % in trans-portal technique vs. 32 and 41 % in outside-in technique). The average value and ranges of tibial tunnel location also showed similar results in two groups. The outside-in technique showed longer femoral tunnel than the trans-portal technique (34.0 vs. 36.8 mm, p = 0.001). The range of femoral tunnel was also wider in trans-portal technique than in outside-in technique. Although the outside-in technique showed significant acute graft bending angle than trans-portal technique in average values, the trans-portal technique showed wider ranges in graft bending angle than outside-in technique [ranges 73A degrees (SD 13.6) vs. 53A degrees (SD 10.7), respectively]. Although both trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction can provide relatively consistent in femoral and tibial tunnel locations, trans-portal technique showed high variability in femoral tunnel length and graft bending angles than outside-in technique. Therefore, the outside-in technique in ACL reconstruction is considered as the effective method for surgeons to make more consistent femoral tunnel. III. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY | - |
dc.subject | ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT | - |
dc.subject | KNEE FLEXION ANGLE | - |
dc.subject | FEMORAL TUNNEL | - |
dc.subject | 21ST-CENTURY LITERATURE | - |
dc.subject | TRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUE | - |
dc.subject | LENGTH | - |
dc.subject | POSITION | - |
dc.subject | PLACEMENT | - |
dc.title | Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000400855000033 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00167-015-3950-8 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, v.25, no.4, pp.1227 - 1233 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85028271921 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1233 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1227 | - |
dc.citation.title | KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 25 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Sim, Jae-Ang | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Anterior cruciate ligament | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Reconstruction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Trans-portal | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Outside-in | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | KNEE FLEXION ANGLE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FEMORAL TUNNEL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | 21ST-CENTURY LITERATURE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LENGTH | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | POSITION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PLACEMENT | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Orthopedics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Sport Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Orthopedics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Sport Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.