Detailed Information

Cited 10 time in webofscience Cited 11 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSim, Jae-Ang-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jong-Min-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sahnghoon-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Ji-Yong-
dc.contributor.authorSeon, Jong-Keun-
dc.date.available2020-02-27T19:41:17Z-
dc.date.created2020-02-06-
dc.date.issued2017-04-
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/6243-
dc.description.abstractAlthough trans-portal and outside-in techniques are commonly used for anatomical ACL reconstruction, there is very little information on variability in tunnel placement between two techniques. A total of 103 patients who received ACL reconstruction using trans-portal (50 patients) and outside-in techniques (53 patients) were included in the study. The ACL tunnel location, length and graft-femoral tunnel angle were analyzed using the 3D CT knee models, and we compared the location and length of the femoral and tibial tunnels, and graft bending angle between the two techniques. The variability in each technique regarding the tunnel location, length and graft tunnel angle using the range values was also compared. There were no differences in the average of femoral tunnel depth and height between the two groups. The ranges of femoral tunnel depth and height showed no difference between two groups (36 and 41 % in trans-portal technique vs. 32 and 41 % in outside-in technique). The average value and ranges of tibial tunnel location also showed similar results in two groups. The outside-in technique showed longer femoral tunnel than the trans-portal technique (34.0 vs. 36.8 mm, p = 0.001). The range of femoral tunnel was also wider in trans-portal technique than in outside-in technique. Although the outside-in technique showed significant acute graft bending angle than trans-portal technique in average values, the trans-portal technique showed wider ranges in graft bending angle than outside-in technique [ranges 73A degrees (SD 13.6) vs. 53A degrees (SD 10.7), respectively]. Although both trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction can provide relatively consistent in femoral and tibial tunnel locations, trans-portal technique showed high variability in femoral tunnel length and graft bending angles than outside-in technique. Therefore, the outside-in technique in ACL reconstruction is considered as the effective method for surgeons to make more consistent femoral tunnel. III.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.relation.isPartOfKNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY-
dc.subjectANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT-
dc.subjectKNEE FLEXION ANGLE-
dc.subjectFEMORAL TUNNEL-
dc.subject21ST-CENTURY LITERATURE-
dc.subjectTRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUE-
dc.subjectLENGTH-
dc.subjectPOSITION-
dc.subjectPLACEMENT-
dc.titleComparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.wosid000400855000033-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00167-015-3950-8-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, v.25, no.4, pp.1227 - 1233-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85028271921-
dc.citation.endPage1233-
dc.citation.startPage1227-
dc.citation.titleKNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY-
dc.citation.volume25-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSim, Jae-Ang-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAnterior cruciate ligament-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorReconstruction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTrans-portal-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorOutside-in-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusKNEE FLEXION ANGLE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFEMORAL TUNNEL-
dc.subject.keywordPlus21ST-CENTURY LITERATURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLENGTH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOSITION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPLACEMENT-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOrthopedics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSport Sciences-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSurgery-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOrthopedics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySport Sciences-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySurgery-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Sim, Jae Ang photo

Sim, Jae Ang
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE