Evidence Is Enough?: A Systematic Review and Network MetaAnalysis of the Efficacy of Tamsulosin 0.2 mg and Tamsulosin 0.4 mg as an Initial Therapeutic Dose in Asian Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Su Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, In-Soo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Eun, Sung-Jong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Whangbo, Taeg-Keun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jin Wook | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Young Sam | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Joon Chul | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-27T19:43:06Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-02-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2093-4777 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/6370 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: We compared the efficacy of tamsulosin between 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg in Asian prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients using network meta-analysis due to lack of studies with direct comparison. Methods: The literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Keywords used were " BPH," " tamsulosin," " placebo." Experimental groups were defined as tamsulosin 0.2 mg (Tam 0.2) and 0.4 mg (Tam 0.4) and common control group was defined as placebo for indirect treatment comparison. Mixed treatment comparison was performed including one direct comparison study. Results: Seven studies met the eligible criteria. Indirect treatment comparison revealed that total International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and quality of life score of IPSS were not significantly different in Tam 0.2 and Tam 0.4 (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference of maximal flow rate and postvoid residual urine volume in Tam 0.2 and Tam 0.4 (P > 0.05). Mixed treatment comparison including one direct comparison study showed inconsistency (P < 0.001). Therefore, analysis using direct treatment comparison effect sizes of Tam 0.2 vs. placebo and Tam 0.4 vs. placebo was done and there was no significant difference. Conclusions: Network meta-analysis showed no difference of efficacy between tamsulosin 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg and the evidence of tamsulosin 0.4 mg as initial dose for Asian BPH patient seems to be insufficient. Therefore, initial dose of tamsulosin for Asian BPH patient should be 0.2 mg. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | KOREAN CONTINENCE SOC | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL | - |
dc.subject | URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS | - |
dc.subject | DOUBLE-BLIND | - |
dc.subject | 1ST-LINE TREATMENT | - |
dc.subject | TOLERABILITY | - |
dc.subject | ANTAGONISTS | - |
dc.subject | ESCALATION | - |
dc.subject | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject | SILODOSIN | - |
dc.subject | SECONDARY | - |
dc.subject | TADALAFIL | - |
dc.title | Evidence Is Enough?: A Systematic Review and Network MetaAnalysis of the Efficacy of Tamsulosin 0.2 mg and Tamsulosin 0.4 mg as an Initial Therapeutic Dose in Asian Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000397737200006 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5213/inj.1734826.413 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, v.21, no.1, pp.29 - 37 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002210928 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85016250514 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 37 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 29 | - |
dc.citation.title | INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL | - |
dc.citation.volume | 21 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Whangbo, Taeg-Keun | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Prostatic Hyperplasia | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Tamsulosin | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Asian | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Men | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Dose | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DOUBLE-BLIND | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | 1ST-LINE TREATMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TOLERABILITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANTAGONISTS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ESCALATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SILODOSIN | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SECONDARY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TADALAFIL | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Urology & Nephrology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Urology & Nephrology | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.