Detailed Information

Cited 25 time in webofscience Cited 26 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The current status of clinical research involving microneedles: A systematic review

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Seung-Yeon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jung-Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ye-Seul-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Youn-Sub-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji-Yeun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Song-Yi-
dc.date.available2020-12-04T00:40:27Z-
dc.date.created2020-11-30-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.issn1999-4923-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/79182-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, a number of clinical trials have been published on the efficacy and safety of drug delivery using microneedles (MNs). This review aims to systematically summarize and analyze the current evidence including the clinical effect and safety of MNs. Three electronic databases, including PubMed, were used to search the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) that evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of MNs from their inception to 28 June 2018. Data were extracted according to the characteristics of study subjects; disorder, types, and details of the intervention (MNs) and control groups; outcome measurements; effectiveness; and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Overall, 31 RCTs and seven CCTs met the inclusion criteria. Although MNs were commonly used in skin-related studies, evaluating the effects of MNs was difficult because many studies did not provide adequate comparison values between groups. For osteoporosis treatment, vaccine, and insulin delivery studies, MNs were comparable to or more effective than the gold standard. Regarding the safety of MNs, most AEs reported in each study were minor (grade 1 or 2). A well-designed RCT is necessary to clearly evaluate the effectiveness of MNs in the future. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isPartOfPharmaceutics-
dc.titleThe current status of clinical research involving microneedles: A systematic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.wosid000593714800001-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/pharmaceutics12111113-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPharmaceutics, v.12, no.11-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85096449070-
dc.citation.titlePharmaceutics-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJeong, Seung-Yeon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Jung-Hwan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Ye-Seul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Youn-Sub-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Song-Yi-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMicroneedle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRandomized controlled trial-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorResearch and development-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSystematic review-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
한의과대학 > 한의예과 > 1. Journal Articles
바이오나노대학 > 바이오나노학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Youn Sub photo

Kim, Youn Sub
College of Korean Medicine (Premedical course of Oriental Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE