1930年代 歐元懷(1893-1978)의 大學敎育論과 敎育의 中國化Ou Yuan-Huai's Theory of Higher Education in the 1930s and the “Sinicization of Education”
- Other Titles
- Ou Yuan-Huai's Theory of Higher Education in the 1930s and the “Sinicization of Education”
- Authors
- 정문상
- Issue Date
- Dec-2020
- Publisher
- 중국근현대사학회
- Keywords
- Ou Yuan-Huai; Daxia University; Sinicization Education; National Revival Education; Dewey’s Education Theories; Traditional Culture; Personality Education; Production Education; 구원회; 대하대학; 교육의 중국화; 민족부흥교육; 듀이의 교육사상; 전통문화; 인격교육; 생산교육; 歐元懷; 大夏大學; 敎育中國化; 民族復興敎育; 杜威的敎育思想; 傳統文化; 人格敎育; 生産敎育
- Citation
- 중국근현대사연구, no.88, pp.89 - 109
- Journal Title
- 중국근현대사연구
- Number
- 88
- Start Page
- 89
- End Page
- 109
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/79666
- ISSN
- 1598-8287
- Abstract
- This paper analyzes how the “Sinicization of Education” was implemented in the classroom to more fully understand unfolding discussions about this issue within the educational field. Thus, I have focused on the theory of higher education, or the theory of national revival education, formulated by Ou Yuan-Huai, vice principal of Daxia (大夏) University, which is recognized as one of the “four major private universities in Shanghai.” With an education degree from Columbia University, he was an educator belonging to the so-called “Dewey School.” First, Ou Yuan-Huai was critical of the policy of Party Education(黨化敎育) and practical teaching of the Nationalist Government. He argued that, contrary to claims of the government, there was not an excess of students in the liberal arts and law and that they did not have a disadvantage when finding a job. He stressed that Party Education and practical teaching could not achieve the purposes of college education, such as seeking the truth, academic research, and fostering future talent. His view of higher education was similar to that of the liberal educators collected in the magazine Independence Review(獨立評論).
Second, he was critical of the so-called New School System based on the American model. He claimed that college education had been commercialized because of the New School System and the credit system in particular. He was in favor of the government’s education policy to change the credit system to an academic year system. However, he emphasized that students’ proactivity and creativity had to be secured even if the new system was implemented.
Third, the National Revival Education(民族復興敎育) he proposed consisted of personality education, production education, and physical and military education. He insisted on rediscovering the values of traditional Chinese culture in personality education and actively using them, and on employing John Dewey’s educational theories for production education.
Ou Yuan-Huai’s theory of higher education shows how complicated discussions on the “Sinicization of Education” were. In discussions on the “Sinicization of Education,” criticisms and use of John Dewey’s educational theories, criticisms, and responses to the government’s education policies, and the use and criticisms of traditional cultural resources, are intricately intertwined.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 가천리버럴아츠칼리지 > 자유전공(인문) > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/79666)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.