LIBERAL TAIWAN VERSUS ILLIBERAL SOUTH KOREA: THE DIVERGENT PATHS OF ELECTION CAMPAIGN REGULATION
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 유종성 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jiun-Da Lin | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-16T00:40:51Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-12-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-2408 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/79937 | - |
dc.description.abstract | South Korea and Taiwan have developed very different sets of election campaign regulations. While both countries had highly restrictive campaign rules during the authoritarian era, they have diverged since democratic transition. South Korea still imposes numerous restrictions on campaigning activities, but Taiwan has removed most of the restrictions. We explore the causes of these divergent trajectories through comparative historical process tracing, focusing on critical junctures and path dependence. We find that incumbency advantage and containment of new opposition parties were the primary objectives of introducing stringent regulations under the authoritarian regimes in both countries. The key difference was that, during the democratic transition, legislators affiliated with the opposition parties as well as the ruling party in South Korea enjoyed the incumbency advantage but that opposition forces in Taiwan did not. As a result, the opposition in Taiwan fought for liberalization of campaign regulations, but the South Korean opposition did not. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Journal of East Asian Studies | - |
dc.title | LIBERAL TAIWAN VERSUS ILLIBERAL SOUTH KOREA: THE DIVERGENT PATHS OF ELECTION CAMPAIGN REGULATION | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000613691400009 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/jea.2020.12 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of East Asian Studies, v.20, no.3, pp.437 - 462 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002655477 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85100377993 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 462 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 437 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of East Asian Studies | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 유종성 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | election campaign regulation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | incumbency advantage | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | path dependence | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | South Korea | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Taiwan | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.