중소기업 보호와 대기업과의 상생을 위한 법적 제도에 관한 연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 서완석 | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-20T04:05:57Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-04-20 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-3362 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/80801 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Recently, the Shared Growth between big conglomerates and small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) becomes the conversation topic in Korea. It is focused on the alleviating business polarization. SME is a business that is privately owned and operated, with a small number of employees and relatively low volume of sales. Also, SMEs are normally privately owned corporations, partnerships, or sole proprietorships. Small businesses often face a variety of problems related to their size,government policies, and economic systems. The problem is the polarization of big business and SMEs. The gap in profit rate between large companies and SMEs has been widening steadily, and the income gap. Especially, it is relevant in the government policies of highly industrialized structure emphasizing big business from 1960s in Korea. In order to promote the substantive equality between big business and SMEs, it is necessary that the government intervenes in the business markets at regular intervals. There is only one way that the government reform the legal system. The ways to prevent business polarization and the shared growth between big conglomerates and SMEs are as follows. First of all, the economic and actual profit of SMEs should be guaranteed. Second, the government should try to modify rules that had effectively banned big business from participating in markets. Third, it is necessary that the government develops and protects an area of SMEs’ own market. Fourth, the government should be looking into various ways of invigorating the protection of SMEs. For example, unfair trades of big business should be concretely restricted by application of the punitive damage rule. Today, it is necessary for the precautionary function of the law to secure national competitiveness. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한국상사법학회 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 상사법연구 | - |
dc.title | 중소기업 보호와 대기업과의 상생을 위한 법적 제도에 관한 연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study on the Protection of the Small and Medium Business and the Win Win Approach to Big Business and SMB | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 상사법연구, v.30, no.4, pp.35 - 84 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001641373 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 84 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 35 | - |
dc.citation.title | 상사법연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 30 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 서완석 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 동반성장 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사회적 자본 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 산업생태계 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사업조정제도 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사업이양제도 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 적합업종지정 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 협력이익배분제 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 기술임치제도 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 유통법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 상생법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 하도급법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 중소기업기본법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | shared growth | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | big conglomerate | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | small and mid-sized enterprise | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | polarization of big business and SMEs | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.