When Is Primary Metacarpal Corrective Osteotomy Recommended in Patients with Flatt Type IV Radial Polydactyly?

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine when primary metacarpal corrective osteotomy is recommended in patients with Flatt type IV radial polydactyly. METHODS: A total of 78 patients with Flatt type IV radial polydactyly were included. The authors performed metacarpal osteotomy if the angulation of the metacarpophalangeal joint was not correctable by the intraoperative radial stress test. The authors measured the metacarpal deviation angle of the thumb in simple posteroanterior radiographs. The clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand evaluation total score and the metacarpal deviation angle correction angle. These outcomes were compared between the patients who underwent metacarpal osteotomy and those who did not. Of the patients who did not undergo metacarpal osteotomy, the relationships between preoperative metacarpal deviation angle and the metacarpal deviation angle correction angle were formulated using segmented linear regression analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographic features and the value of preoperative metacarpal deviation angle between the two groups. However, the metacarpal deviation angle correction angle and Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand evaluation total score were significantly higher in the patients who underwent metacarpal osteotomy. The segmented linear regression analysis demonstrated a breakpoint, indicating that the soft-tissue procedure alone does not sufficiently correct the metacarpal deviation angle. For the postoperative metacarpal deviation angle to be 5 degrees, the preoperative metacarpal deviation angle was calculated as 10.8 degrees. CONCLUSION: If the preoperative metacarpal deviation angle is greater than 10.8 degrees, metacarpal osteotomy can be considered even in patients with correctable metacarpophalangeal joint by intraoperative radial stress test. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III. Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.