Quality of life discordance between terminal cancer patients and family caregivers: a multicenter study
- Authors
- Lee, Yong Joo; Kim, Jung Eun; Choi, Youn Seon; Hwang, In Cheol; Hwang, Sun Wook; Kim, Young Sung; Kim, Hyo Min; Ahn, Hong Yup; Kim, So Jin
- Issue Date
- Jul-2016
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Keywords
- Discordance; Emotional distress; Family caregiver; Quality of life; Terminal cancer
- Citation
- SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, v.24, no.7, pp.2853 - 2860
- Journal Title
- SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Volume
- 24
- Number
- 7
- Start Page
- 2853
- End Page
- 2860
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/8114
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00520-016-3108-3
- ISSN
- 0941-4355
- Abstract
- Background Research studies on quality of life (QOL) discordance between cancer patients and family caregivers are limited, and the results are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine QOL discordance between patients and family caregivers in a hospice setting and to identify factors associated with the discordance. Methods We enrolled 178 patient-family caregiver pairs from six tertiary hospital hospice palliative care units in South Korea in this cross-sectional study. To establish groupings based on patient and family caregiver QOL levels, we measured the QOL of patient and family caregiver pairs using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 for Palliative Care and the Caregiver QOL Index-Cancer, respectively. Pairs were categorized into the following three groups: both good QOL pairs, only poor patient QOL, and only poor family caregiver QOL. Factors associated with only poor patient or only poor family caregiver QOL were compared to both good QOL pairs. A stepwise multivariate regression model was used to identify relevant factors. Results The QOL of family caregivers did not correlate significantly (P=0.227) with QOL in terminally ill cancer patients. As well, poor emotional function in patients was the only significant factor associated with the only poor patient QOL group [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.1; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.5-11.5]. However, emotionally distressed family caregivers (aOR, 10.2; 95 % CI, 2.8-37.5), family caregiverswho professed a religion (aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-11.3), and family caregivers with low social support (aOR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5-10.6) were independent predictors for the only poor family caregiver QOL group. Conclusions Assessing the respective emotional status of both the patient and family caregiver is needed in hospice care to reduce the gap in QOL between the two groups. Further, more attention should be paid to the lack of social support for family caregivers.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/8114)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.