Dynamic Hip Screw versus Cannulated Cancellous Screw in Pauwels Type II or Type III Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lim, Eic Ju | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shon, Hyun-Chul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Jae-Woo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Jong-Keon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Junhyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Chul-Ho | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-08T01:40:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-08T01:40:19Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-11-05 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4426 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/82621 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are known to be especially unstable FNFs, and they have a higher associated risk of failure. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) technique and the cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) technique are the two main fixation techniques used in the treatment of FNFs. However, no large clinical study has compared the DHS and CCS techniques in patients with high-shear-angle FNFs. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies that compared the DHS and CCS techniques for the treatment of Pauwels type II or type III FNF. Pooled analysis was performed to identify differences between the DHS and CCS techniques in Pauwels type II or type III FNF, with a focus on postoperative complications such as fracture nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We included five studies with a total of 252 patients. The DHS technique was used in 96 patients (DHS group), and the CCS technique was used in 156 patients (CCS group). The pooled analysis revealed that the nonunion rate in the CCS group was significantly higher than that in the DHS group (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.96; p = 0.04, I2 = 0%), but there was no difference in the incidence of ONFH between the groups (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.20-4.73; p = 0.98, I2 = 53%). For vertically oriented FNFs, the DHS technique is more favorable and has a lower risk of fracture nonunion than the CCS technique. © 2021 by the authors. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Journal of Personalized Medicine | - |
dc.title | Dynamic Hip Screw versus Cannulated Cancellous Screw in Pauwels Type II or Type III Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000711305900001 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jpm11101017 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Personalized Medicine, v.11, no.10 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85118141091 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of Personalized Medicine | - |
dc.citation.volume | 11 | - |
dc.citation.number | 10 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Junhyun | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Cannulated screw | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Dynamic hip screw | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Femoral neck fracture | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pauwels type | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Vertical | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Health Care Sciences & Services | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | General & Internal Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Health Care Sciences & Services | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, General & Internal | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.