A Systematic Review on Comparative Analyses between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Ureter Stone According to Stone Size
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Hae Do | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, Youna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Joo Yong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Seon Heui | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-06T00:40:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-06T00:40:26Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-01-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1010-660X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/83138 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the treatment outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) according to the ureteral stone size. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review, relevant articles that compared SWL and URSL for treatment of ureteral stones were identified. Articles were selected from four English databases including Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of controlled Trials (Central), and Google Scholar. A quality assessment was carried out by our researchers independently using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). A total of 1325 studies were identified, but after removing duplicates, there remained 733 studies. Of these studies, 439 were excluded, 294 were screened, and 18 met the study eligibility criteria. Results: In randomized control trial (RCT) studies, URSL showed significantly higher SFR than SWL (p < 0.01, OR= 0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.55, I-2 = 29%). The same results were shown in sub-group analysis according to the size of the stone (p < 0.01, OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.25-0.63; >1 cm: p < 0.01, OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.74, I-2 = 55%; not specified: p < 0.01, OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.72, I-2 = 70%). In the non-RCT studies, the effectiveness of the URSL was significantly superior to that of SWL (p < 0.01, OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52, I-2 = 83%). Retreatment rate was significantly lower in URSL than in SWL regardless of stone size (p < 0.01, OR = 10.22, 95% CI 6.76-15.43, I-2 = 54%). Conclusions: Meta-analysis results show that SFR was higher than SWL in URSL and that URSL was superior to SWL in retreatment rate. However, more randomized trials are required to identify definitive conclusions. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | - |
dc.title | A Systematic Review on Comparative Analyses between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Ureter Stone According to Stone Size | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000735485900001 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/medicina57121369 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, v.57, no.12 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85122391180 | - |
dc.citation.title | MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | - |
dc.citation.volume | 57 | - |
dc.citation.number | 12 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Seon Heui | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ureteral calculi | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | lithotripsy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ureteroscopy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | systematic review | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COST-EFFECTIVENESS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LASER LITHOTRIPSY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SEMIRIGID URETERORENOSCOPE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CALCULI | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | METAANALYSIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HOLMIUM | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DISEASE | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | General & Internal Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, General & Internal | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.