Comparison between Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning in Classifying Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis upon CT Venography
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, Jung Han | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seo, Jae Won | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jeong Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Suyoung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Young Jae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Kwang Gi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-30T10:40:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-30T10:40:05Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-01-27 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4418 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/83862 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, we aimed to investigate quantitative differences in performance in terms of comparing the automated classification of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) using two categories of artificial intelligence algorithms: deep learning based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and conventional machine learning. We retrospectively enrolled 659 participants (DVT patients, 282; normal controls, 377) who were evaluated using contrast-enhanced lower extremity computed tomography (CT) venography. Conventional machine learning consists of logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), and extreme gradient boosts (XGB). Deep learning based on CNN included the VGG16, VGG19, Resnet50, and Resnet152 models. According to the mean generated AUC values, we found that the CNN-based VGG16 model showed a 0.007 higher performance (0.982 ± 0.014) as compared with the XGB model (0.975 ± 0.010), which showed the highest performance among the conventional machine learning models. In the conventional machine learning-based classifications, we found that the radiomic features presenting a statistically significant effect were median values and skewness. We found that the VGG16 model within the deep learning algorithm distinguished deep vein thrombosis on CT images most accurately, with slightly higher AUC values as compared with the other AI algorithms used in this study. Our results guide research directions and medical practice. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Diagnostics | - |
dc.title | Comparison between Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning in Classifying Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis upon CT Venography | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000770676600001 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/diagnostics12020274 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Diagnostics, v.12, no.2 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85123091795 | - |
dc.citation.title | Diagnostics | - |
dc.citation.volume | 12 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Hwang, Jung Han | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Seo, Jae Won | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Jeong Ho | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Suyoung | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Young Jae | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Kwang Gi | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Computed tomography | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Deep learning | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Deep vein thrombosis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Machine learning | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Radiomics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | General & Internal Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, General & Internal | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.