Endovascular treatment of ruptured basilar artery trunk aneurysm in the acute period: risk factors for periprocedural complications

Abstract

Objectives Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become a popular option for the treatment of basilar artery (BA) trunk aneurysms because microsurgery of these lesions is difficult due to narrow surgical fields and perforating arteries or cranial nerves in the brainstem. The purpose of this study is to report our experiences using EVT for ruptured BA trunk aneurysms in the acute period and to evaluate the risk factors for periprocedural complications. Methods From October 2004 to December 2020, a total of 27 consecutive patients with ruptured BA trunk aneurysms were treated with EVT. All patients met the following criteria: presence of ruptured BA trunk aneurysms and treatment with EVT for those aneurysms within 72 hours of rupture. The incidence of and risk factors for periprocedural complications were evaluated retrospectively. Results Among the 27 patients, periprocedural complications occurred in 4 patients (14.8%); mass effect inducing cranial neuropathy due to brainstem compression in 1 (3.7%) and brainstem infarction in 3 (11.1%). Hemorrhagic complications did not occur within 30 days. Subacute or delayed thromboembolic complications were not observed during the follow-up period. Large/giant aneurysm (odds ratio [OR], 6.417; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.732-18.031; P = 0.045) and stent-assisted coiling (OR, 4.145; 95% CI, 1.018-14.212; P = 0.031) remained independent risk factors for periprocedural complications based on multiple logistic regression analysis. Conclusions When performing stent-assisted coiling for ruptured large/giant BA trunk aneurysms, awareness of and caution regarding periprocedural complications, such as brainstem infarction caused by thromboembolism or brainstem compression due to mass effect, are necessary.