Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Task Scheduling Mechanisms for Fog Computing: A Systematic Survey

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHosseinzadeh, Mehdi-
dc.contributor.authorAzhir, Elham-
dc.contributor.authorLansky, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorMildeova, Stanislava-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Omed Hassan-
dc.contributor.authorMalik, Mazhar Hussain-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Faheem-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-09T02:40:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-09T02:40:20Z-
dc.date.created2023-07-09-
dc.date.issued2023-05-
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/88401-
dc.description.abstractIn the Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem, some processing is done near data production sites at higher speeds without the need for high bandwidth by combining Fog Computing (FC) and cloud computing. Fog computing offers advantages for real-time systems that require high speed internet connectivity. Due to the limited resources of fog nodes, one of the most important challenges of FC is to meet dynamic needs in real-time. Therefore, one of the issues in the fog environment is the optimal assignment of tasks to fog nodes. An efficient scheduling algorithm should reduce various qualitative parameters such as cost and energy consumption, taking into account the heterogeneity of fog nodes and the commitment to perform tasks within their deadlines. This study provides a detailed taxonomy to gain a better understanding of the research issues and distinguishes important challenges in existing work. Therefore, a systematic overview of existing task scheduling techniques for cloud-fog environment, as well as their benefits and drawbacks, is presented in this article. Four main categories are introduced to study these techniques, including machine learning-based, heuristic-based, metaheuristic-based, and deterministic mechanisms. A number of papers are studied in each category. This survey also compares different task scheduling techniques in terms of execution time, resource utilization, delay, network bandwidth, energy consumption, execution deadline, response time, cost, uncertainty, and complexity. The outcomes revealed that 38% of the scheduling algorithms use metaheuristic-based mechanisms, 30% use heuristic-based, 23% use machine learning algorithms, and the other 9% use deterministic methods. The energy consumption is the most significant parameter addressed in most articles with a share of 19%. Finally, a number of important areas for improving the task scheduling methods in the FC in the future are presented.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC-
dc.relation.isPartOfIEEE ACCESS-
dc.titleTask Scheduling Mechanisms for Fog Computing: A Systematic Survey-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.wosid001005670600001-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3277826-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationIEEE ACCESS, v.11, pp.50994 - 51017-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85160275621-
dc.citation.endPage51017-
dc.citation.startPage50994-
dc.citation.titleIEEE ACCESS-
dc.citation.volume11-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKhan, Faheem-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTask analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProcessor scheduling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSurveys-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEdge computing-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDynamic scheduling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSystematics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCosts-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorQuality of service-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFog computing-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcloud computing-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortask scheduling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormethods-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorquality of service-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENERGY-EFFICIENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCLOUD-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIOT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALLOCATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRATEGY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEDGE-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaComputer Science-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaTelecommunications-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryComputer Science, Information Systems-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Electrical & Electronic-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryTelecommunications-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
IT융합대학 > 컴퓨터공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Khan, Faheem photo

Khan, Faheem
College of IT Convergence (컴퓨터공학부(컴퓨터공학전공))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE