Comparison between single and serial computed tomography images in classification of acute appendicitis, acute right-sided diverticulitis, and normal appendix using EfficientNet
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, So Hyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Young Jae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Kwang Gi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Jun-Won | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyun Cheol | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, In Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | You, Myung-Won | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Gi Pyo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, Jung Han | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-23T13:40:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-23T13:40:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-05 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/88602 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) using the EfficientNet algorithm for the automated classification of acute appendicitis, acute diverticulitis, and normal appendix and to evaluate its diagnostic performance. We retrospectively enrolled 715 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Of these, 246 patients had acute appendicitis, 254 had acute diverticulitis, and 215 had normal appendix. Training, validation, and test data were obtained from 4,078 CT images (1,959 acute appendicitis, 823 acute diverticulitis, and 1,296 normal appendix cases) using both single and serial (RGB [red, green, blue]) image methods. We augmented the training dataset to avoid training disturbances caused by unbalanced CT datasets. For classification of the normal appendix, the RGB serial image method showed a slightly higher sensitivity (89.66 vs. 87.89%; p = 0.244), accuracy (93.62% vs. 92.35%), and specificity (95.47% vs. 94.43%) than did the single image method. For the classification of acute diverticulitis, the RGB serial image method also yielded a slightly higher sensitivity (83.35 vs. 80.44%; p = 0.019), accuracy (93.48% vs. 92.15%), and specificity (96.04% vs. 95.12%) than the single image method. Moreover, the mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were significantly higher for acute appendicitis (0.951 vs. 0.937; p < 0.0001), acute diverticulitis (0.972 vs. 0.963; p = 0.0025), and normal appendix (0.979 vs. 0.972; p = 0.0101) with the RGB serial image method than those obtained by the single method for each condition. Thus, acute appendicitis, acute diverticulitis, and normal appendix could be accurately distinguished on CT images by our model, particularly when using the RGB serial image method. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE | - |
dc.title | Comparison between single and serial computed tomography images in classification of acute appendicitis, acute right-sided diverticulitis, and normal appendix using EfficientNet | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000996071600048 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0281498 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PLOS ONE, v.18, no.5 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85160177866 | - |
dc.citation.title | PLOS ONE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORKS | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Multidisciplinary Sciences | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
1342, Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea(13120)031-750-5114
COPYRIGHT 2020 Gachon University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.