Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Aesthetic doctors' perception and attitudes toward tolerance in botulinum toxin

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorOh, Seung Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyoung Moon-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Tae Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Min Soo-
dc.contributor.authorRee, Yoo-Seock-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Eun Soo-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-04T05:00:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-04T05:00:21Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.issn0909-752X-
dc.identifier.issn1600-0846-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/91097-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundBotulinum toxin is a crucial therapeutic tool with broad indications in both cosmetic and medical fields. However, the expanding cosmetic use and increased dosages of botulinum toxin have raised concerns about resistance, making it essential to study the awareness and management practices among healthcare professionals.MethodsA survey was conducted among clinical physicians using botulinum toxin. The study investigated their experiences, awareness, and management practices related to toxin resistance. Real-time mobile app-based surveys were administered to clinicians attending the 45th International Academic Conference of the Korean Academy of Laser and Dermatology (KALDAT) on December 3, 2023.ResultsAmong 3140 participants, 673 clinical physicians completed the survey. Of these, 363 clinicians (53.9%) reported experiencing botulinum toxin resistance. Regarding the resistance rate, 59.4% indicated less than 1%, 36% reported approximately 1%-25%, and 95.4% reported less than 25%. Efforts to prevent resistance included maintaining intervals of over 3 months (54.8%), using products with lower resistance potential (47.0%), employing minimal effective doses (28.2%), and minimizing re-administration (14.9%).ConclusionIn the South Korean aesthetic medicine community, a majority of clinical physician's report encountering botulinum toxin resistance. Given the potential loss of various benefits associated with resistance, there is a need to establish appropriate guidelines based on mechanistic studies and current status assessments. Educating clinicians on applicable guidelines is crucial.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.titleAesthetic doctors' perception and attitudes toward tolerance in botulinum toxin-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid001196768700001-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/srt.13691-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, v.30, no.4-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85189629524-
dc.citation.titleSKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoraesthetic doctor-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbotulinum toxin-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorprevention of toxin resistance-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortolerance-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFAILURE-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaDermatology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryDermatology-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE