Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Internal consistency reliability of the Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Eleanor-
dc.contributor.authorLevoy, Kristin-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chang-
dc.contributor.authorVillalobos, Azucena-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Paige-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.authorHirschman, Karen B.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-07T13:00:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-07T13:00:26Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.issn1359-1053-
dc.identifier.issn1461-7277-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/91461-
dc.description.abstractThe Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) assesses patients' perspectives of their illnesses. Original psychometric testing occurred in limited populations. The purpose of this reliability generalization meta-analysis was to: (1) estimate internal consistency reliability of each IPQ-R subscale, and (2) test moderators of these estimates. Web of Science was searched in July 2022 for articles citing the original IPQ-R paper that reported IPQ-R reliability data. Cronbach's alphas (alpha) were pooled for each IPQ-R subscale using inverse variance weighting and DerSimonian and Laird estimation. Sixty-six studies met criteria. Overall pooled alpha estimates were acceptable: 0.71-0.87. Treatment control reliability was reduced among cardiac (alpha = 0.68), diabetes/kidney disease (alpha = 0.63), and mixed/other (alpha = 0.66) samples; cyclical reliability was reduced in cancer (alpha = 0.65) samples. Age, gender, and race were also significant moderators. Subscale reliability varied based on sample characteristics. Adapting IPQ-R subscales to account for sample variation could improve measurement of illness perception constructs.-
dc.format.extent13-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD-
dc.titleInternal consistency reliability of the Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid001156695000001-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/13591053231221351-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, v.29, no.7, pp 734 - 746-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85184420308-
dc.citation.endPage746-
dc.citation.startPage734-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume29-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorchronic disease-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorillness perception-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorillness representation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormeta-analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreliability-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOLDER-ADULTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSELF-CARE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBRIEF IPQ-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREPRESENTATIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRANSLATION-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPsychology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPsychology, Clinical-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Min Jung photo

Kim, Min Jung
Nursing (Dept.of Nursing)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE