Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

CTGAN VS TGAN? Which one is more suitable for generating synthetic EEG data

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorCheon, Min Jong-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dong Hee-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji Woong-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Hye Jin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jun Seuck-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ook-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-30T04:44:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-30T04:44:46Z-
dc.date.created2021-07-14-
dc.date.issued2021-05-
dc.identifier.issn1992-8645-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/1155-
dc.description.abstractBCI has been an alternative method of communication between a user and a system, and EEG is a representative non-invasive neuroimaging technique in BCI research. However, gathering a large dataset of EEG is difficult due to insufficient conditions. Therefore, a data augmentation is required for the data and a generative adversarial network is a representative model for the augmentation. As the EEG data is a CSV format, we decided to utilize CTGAN and TGAN for creating synthetic data. Our research was conducted through 3 steps. First of all, we compared two datasets from each model through data visualization. Secondly, we conducted a statical method for calculating similarity score. Lastly, we used both data as input data of the machine learning algorithms. Through the first step and second step, we found that the data from CTGAN has higher similarity than TGAN. However, in the last step, the result showed that the result such as accuracy, precision, recall, f1 score showed no significant difference between the two datasets. Furthermore, compared to the original dataset, none of the synthetic datasets showed higher scores. Therefore, we concluded that further research is needed to find out a better method for data augmentation so that the synthetic data could be utilized for the input data of machine learning or deep learning algorithms.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLittle Lion Scientific-
dc.titleCTGAN VS TGAN? Which one is more suitable for generating synthetic EEG data-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Ook-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85107391702-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, v.99, no.10, pp.2359 - 2372-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology-
dc.citation.volume99-
dc.citation.number10-
dc.citation.startPage2359-
dc.citation.endPage2372-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorArtificial Intelligence-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBCI-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorData Augmentation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDeep Learning-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEEG-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGAN-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > 서울 정보시스템학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Ook photo

Lee, Ook
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE