Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorBae, Sung-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Inah-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Jaechul-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Euy-Suk-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T10:17:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-06T10:17:06Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.issn1749-8090-
dc.identifier.issn1749-8090-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/139529-
dc.description.abstractBackground This study investigated the efficacy of first-generation (cefazolin) and third-generation (ceftizoxime) prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the incidence of surgical site infections, hospitalizations, and medical costs. Methods All adult patients (≥ 20 years) undergoing cardiac surgery at one hospital from January 01, 2009, to December 31, 2016, were included in this study. A single prophylactic antibiotic was administered at a dose of 1 g within one hour of the surgical incision and for three days after surgery at eight-hour intervals. After propensity score matching, 194 patients in each antibiotic prophylaxis group (first-generation vs third-generation) were analyzed. Among the 388 patients, the incidence of surgical site infections was compared according to the type of prophylactic antibiotic, and risk factors were evaluated by chi-squared tests followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results The incidence of deep surgical site infections was significantly lower in the first-generation group (5.7%) than in the third-generation group (16.5%). The pathogens isolated from the surgical infection sites were similarly distributed in both groups. However, the prevalence of highly infectious gram-positive bacteria was more than that of gram-negative bacteria (67% vs 23%). The preoperative hospitalization duration, mean operation time, and ventilator use time were similar in both groups, but the postoperative hospitalization duration was significantly shorter in the first-generation group (25.5 days) than in the third-generation group (29.8 days). In addition, the medical costs were lower in the first-generation group (20,594 USD) than in the third-generation group (26,488 USD). Conclusion In conclusion, the first-generation prophylactic antibiotic was better than the third-generation in reducing surgical site infection rates, hospitalization length, and medical expenditures.-
dc.format.extent9-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.titleThe effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85124174539-
dc.identifier.wosid000751312000001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, v.17, no.1, pp 1 - 9-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery-
dc.citation.volume17-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.endPage9-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaCardiovascular System & Cardiology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSurgery-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryCardiac & Cardiovascular Systems-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySurgery-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURGICAL-SITE INFECTIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusADVISORY STATEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREVENTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOPERATIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGUIDELINE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProphylactic antibiotics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSurgical site infection-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPropensity score matching-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMedical expenditures-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://cardiothoracicsurgery.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 직업환경의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Inah photo

Kim, Inah
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE