중소 건설사 관점의 공동도급 협업 저해 요인 사례연구

Abstract

공동도급제도는 사업 리스크를 분산시키고, 공사 수행능력 상호 보완, 기술능력 향상 등 장점이 있다. 그러나 공동도급 공사 시 기업규모에 차이에 의한 협업 저해 리스크가 존재한다. 이에 본 연구는 중소건설업체의 사례를 건설 단계별로 나누어 업체간 규모 차이에 따른 분쟁 요소와 해결방안을 제시하였다. 30개 사례 기반 전문가심층면접 분석 결과 상호협의 갈등, 페이퍼 컴퍼니 존재, 그리고 관리규정 및 운영에 관한 이슈 등이 있었으며 이에따른 개선방안을 도출하였다. 추후, 이러한 리스크를 해결하기 위해서 기업간 상호신뢰가 필요하며 더 많은 분석이 필요하다고 판단된다.

In the public sector, the joint contract system offers benefits and provides additional opportunities in enabling consortium parties to share risks, improve its technical skills and reward a project more compared to when participating alone. It’s a compulsory rule to include local companies to help facilitate and maintain balance in the development of local regions. Contrary to the purpose behind introducing a joint contract system, detailed institutional laws and operational guidelines have been insufficient, consequently causing difficulties in the management of joint contracts. Specifically, the asymmetric size of parties, specialized human resources and experience influence collaborative efforts during the project phase. Despite asymmetry, the joint contract system was studied from the perspective of major construction companies while focusing on the bidding process. This research aims to explore its conflicts and reasons from relatively small companies based on four stages: bidding, contract, construction and hand-over/termination in H construction company. 30 real cases introducing joint contracts were analyzed along with focus group interviews. The results revealed that risks existed during the preparatory stage of the joint supply and demand operation agreement even after much deliberation due to the differences in company size, some paper companies did not participate in the actual construction process and management regulatory issues surfaced during the organizational phase of the joint supply and demand operation agreement. Therefore, to resolve these conflicts, constant mutual trust is needed between companies and further analysis is necessary from joint contract construction case studies.