Detailed Information

Cited 3 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effects of dexmedetomidine sedation for magnetic resonance imaging in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
Kim, Ji YoonKim, Kyu NamKim, Dong WonLim, Hyun JinLee, Bong Soo
Issue Date
Aug-2021
Publisher
SPRINGER JAPAN KK
Keywords
Dexmedetomidine; Hypnotics and sedatives; Magnetic resonance imaging; Child
Citation
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, v.35, no.4, pp.525 - 535
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA
Volume
35
Number
4
Start Page
525
End Page
535
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/141449
DOI
10.1007/s00540-021-02946-4
ISSN
0913-8668
Abstract
Purpose Pediatric sedation is commonly required to obtain high-quality images in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine sedation for MRI in children. Methods A systematic review was conducted to find all randomized controlled trials concerning dexmedetomidine sedation for MRI in children. We searched databases using the Ovid platform in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database: CRD42020198368. Results Seven studies and 753 participants were included. Dexmedetomidine sedation showed a significantly delayed onset time [weighted mean differences (WMD) = 8.13 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.64 to 11.63, I-2 = 98%] and recovery time (WMD = 5.22 min, 95% CI 0.35 to 10.09, I-2 = 92%) compared to propofol, ketamine, and midazolam sedation. There was no difference in quality of sedation [risk ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.69, I-2 = 89%], or incidence of sedation failure (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 0.53 to 3.66, I-2 = 83%) between groups. Although a significantly decreased heart rate (WMD = - 17.34 beats/minute, 95% CI - 22.42 to - 12.26, I-2 = 96%) was observed, bradycardia that required treatment was not increased (RR = 8.00, 95% CI 1.02 to 62.64, I-2 = 0%). Dexmedetomidine sedation had a lower incidence of desaturation events (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.86, I-2 = 4%). However, there was no difference in incidence of postoperative vomiting (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.17, I-2 = 17%) between groups. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine sedation provided a similar sedation quality with a reduced incidence of desaturation events. However, the delayed onset and recovery times were drawbacks. The clinical significance of bradycardia is considered to be low. GRADE assessment revealed the quality of the evidence in this meta-analysis ranged from very low to moderate.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Kyu Nam photo

Kim, Kyu Nam
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE