Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 3 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double- Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Gwang Ha-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hang Lak-
dc.contributor.authorJoo, Moon Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hong Jun-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Sung Woo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ok-Jae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyungkil-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Hoon Jai-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Soo Teik-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ji Won-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Han Ho-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Il-Kwun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun-Soo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dong Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyoung-Oh-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Yun Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Seun-Ja-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Soo-Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Byung-Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Kwang Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Seong Woo-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae Gyu-
dc.contributor.authorSung, In-Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Nyeun-
dc.contributor.authorSung, Jae Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jong-Jae-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T16:26:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-06T16:26:55Z-
dc.date.created2021-07-15-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.issn1976-2283-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/141543-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta (R) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. Methods: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups: AD-203 twice daily or Mucosta (R) thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; Mucosta (R), n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; Mucosta (R), n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion im-provement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of red-ness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. Results: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta (R)-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta (R)- treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was -4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and -4.44% (95% CI, -13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 Mucosta (R)-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. Conclusions: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (Mucosta (R)) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treat-ing erosive gastritis.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEDITORIAL OFFICE GUT & LIVER-
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double- Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Hang Lak-
dc.identifier.doi10.5009/gnl20338-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85119337237-
dc.identifier.wosid000703342700001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGUT AND LIVER, v.15, no.6, pp.841 - 850-
dc.relation.isPartOfGUT AND LIVER-
dc.citation.titleGUT AND LIVER-
dc.citation.volume15-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage841-
dc.citation.endPage850-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle; Early Access-
dc.identifier.kciidART002776033-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHELICOBACTER-PYLORI-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMECHANISMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDA-9601-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRISK-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAdverse drug reaction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGastritis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorIntention-to-treat analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPhase III clinical trial-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRebamipide-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.gutnliver.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.5009/gnl20338-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Hang Lak photo

Lee, Hang Lak
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE