Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Comparison Between the Conventional and the Laryngoscope-Assisted Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Study

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Eugene-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Byung-Gun-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Young-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Young-Tae-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Jung-Won-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seo-Yun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hee-Pyoung-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-13T11:31:14Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-13T11:31:14Z-
dc.date.created2021-05-14-
dc.date.issued2017-09-
dc.identifier.issn0003-2999-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/151612-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Positioning of a lightwand in the midline of the oral cavity can be challenging in patients with cervical immobilization. Direct laryngoscopy may permit the lightwand tip to more easily access the glottic opening. We tested our hypothesis that a laryngoscope-assisted lightwand technique allows more successful endotracheal intubation than does a conventional lightwand approach. METHODS: A total of 162 patients requiring cervical immobilization during intubation for cervical spine surgery were allocated randomly to 2 groups. The conventional lightwand technique (group C, n = 80) or the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand technique (group L, n = 82) was used for endotracheal intubation. In the group L, a Macintosh laryngoscope was inserted into the oral cavity, advanced until the epiglottis tip was visible, but not used to lift the epiglottis tip. The lightwand tip was placed below the epiglottis under direct view of the epiglottis tip. The primary outcome (the initial intubation success rate) and secondary outcomes (intubation time, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative airway complications) were evaluated. RESULTS: The initial intubation success rate was significantly lower (75% vs 89%; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 1.2 [1.0-1.4]; P = .034) in group C than group L. The intubation time (22 +/- 13 vs 24 +/- 12 seconds; mean difference [98.33% confidence interval]: 2.4 [-2.3 to 7.2]; P = .217) did not differ between groups. Postoperative sore throat score, incidences of hypertension and tachycardia, postoperative oral mucosal bleeding, and hoarseness also did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation did not increase intubation time, and it increased first attempt intubation rates compared with traditional lightwand intubation in patients requiring cervical immobilization for cervical spine surgery.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS-
dc.titleA Comparison Between the Conventional and the Laryngoscope-Assisted Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Eugene-
dc.identifier.doi10.1213/ANE.0000000000001661-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84991453722-
dc.identifier.wosid000407990200022-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, v.125, no.3, pp.854 - 859-
dc.relation.isPartOfANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA-
dc.citation.titleANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA-
dc.citation.volume125-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage854-
dc.citation.endPage859-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docType정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함))-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaAnesthesiology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryAnesthesiology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGLOBAL LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlus4 AIRWAY DEVICES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRACHEAL INTUBATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIFFICULT AIRWAY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSPINE ALIGNMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLIGHTED STYLET-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBENT LENGTH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCADAVER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMOTION-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/2017/09000/A_Comparison_Between_the_Conventional_and_the.23.aspx-
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Eugene photo

Kim, Eugene
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE