Analysis of Participant Factors That Affect the Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Young Joong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Eun Hye | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jun, Jae Kwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Dong-Rock | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Young Mi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hye-Won | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Youme | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Keum Won | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, Hyo Soon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jeong Seon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hye Jung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jo, Hye-Mi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-13T20:04:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-13T20:04:57Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-12 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-07 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-6929 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/152011 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective To analyze participant factors that affect the diagnostic performance of screening mammography. Materials and Methods We enrolled 128756 cases from 10 hospitals between 2005 and 2010. We analyzed recall rate, cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 examinations, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), and interval cancer rate (ICR) per 1000 negative examinations according to participant factors including age, breast density, and number of visit to the same institution, and adjusted for confounding variables. Results Increasing age improved recall rates (27.4% in 40's, 17.5% in 50's, 11.1% in 60's, and 8.6% in 70's), CDR (2.7, 3.2, 2.0, and 2.4), PPV (1.0, 1.8, 1.8, and 2.8%), sensitivity (81.3, 88.8, 90.3, and 94.7%), specificity (72.7, 82.7, 89.0, and 91.7%), and FPR (27.3, 17.3, 11.0, and 8.4%) (p < 0.05). Higher breast density impaired recall rates (4.0% in P1, 9.0% in P2, 28.9% in P3, and 27.8% in P4), PPV (3.3, 2.3, 1.2, and 1.3%), specificity (96.1, 91.2, 71.4, and 72.5%), and FPR (3.9, 8.9, 28.6, and 27.6%) (p < 0.001). It also increased CDR (1.3, 2.1, 3.3, and 3.6) and ICR (0.2, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.6) (p < 0.05). Successive visits to the same institution improved recall rates (20.9% for one visit, 10.7% for two visits, 7.7% for more than three visits), PPV (1.6, 2.8, and 2.7%), specificity (79.4, 89.6, and 92.5%), and FPR (20.6, 10.4, and 7.5%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Young age and dense breasts negatively affected diagnostic performance in mammography screening, whereas successive visits to the same institution had a positive effect. Examinee education for successive visits to the same institution would improve the diagnostic performance. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | KOREAN RADIOLOGICAL SOC | - |
dc.title | Analysis of Participant Factors That Affect the Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Jeong Seon | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.624 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85020648604 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000402487000007 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, v.18, no.4, pp.624 - 631 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 624 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 631 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002248563 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | REPLACEMENT THERAPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DENSITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | AGE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SENSITIVITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | WOMEN | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTERVAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RISK | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | US | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Screening mammography | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Cancer detection rates | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Audit | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | National mammography database | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.kjronline.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.624 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.