Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Tumefactive Gallbladder Sludge at US: Prevalence and Clinical Importance

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Mi mi-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Tae Wook-
dc.contributor.authorJang, Kyung Mi-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young Kon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seong Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorHa, Sang Yun-
dc.contributor.authorSinn, Dong Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorGu, Seonhye-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T03:37:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-14T03:37:48Z-
dc.date.created2021-05-14-
dc.date.issued2017-05-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/152381-
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate the prevalence of tumefactive sludge of the gallbladder detected at ultrasonography (US) and to assess whether any clinical and imaging differences exist between benign and malignant tumefactive sludge. Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. The requirement for informed consent was waived. The study included a cohort (n = 6898) of patients with gallbladder sludge drawn from all adults (n = 115 178) who underwent abdominal US between March 2001 and March 2015. Tumefactive sludge was identified according to the following US findings: (a) nonmovable mass-like lesion and (b) absence of posterior acoustic shadowing at B-mode US and vascularity at color Doppler US. Follow-up examinations were arranged to ascertain whether the results showed true sludge or gallbladder cancer. Risk factors for malignant tumefactive sludge based on clinical and US characteristics were identified with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results The prevalence of gallbladder and tumefactive sludge at abdominal US during the observation period was 6.0% (6898 of 115 178) and 0.1% (135 of 115 178), respectively. Twenty-eight (20.7%) patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 107 with tumefactive sludge, 15 (14%) were confirmed to have malignant tumefactive sludge. The risk factors for malignant tumefactive sludge were old age (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; P = .035), female sex (OR, 5.48; P = .014), and absence of hyperechoic spots within the sludge (OR, 6.78; P = .008). Conclusion Although the prevalence of tumefactive sludge at US was rare, a considerable proportion of patients had a malignancy. Careful follow-up is essential, especially for older patients, women, and those with an absence of hyperechoic spots at US.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRadiological Society of North America-
dc.titleTumefactive Gallbladder Sludge at US: Prevalence and Clinical Importance-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Mi mi-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.2016161042-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85018463644-
dc.identifier.wosid000401897800026-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRadiology, v.283, no.2, pp.570 - 579-
dc.relation.isPartOfRadiology-
dc.citation.titleRadiology-
dc.citation.volume283-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage570-
dc.citation.endPage579-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docType정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함))-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.2016161042-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 영상의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Mimi photo

Kim, Mimi
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE