Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Energy Performance and Applicability Comparison of Two Different Types of Liquid Desiccant Assisted Evaporative Cooling Systems

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sung-Joon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hui-Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorDong, Hye-Won-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Jae Weon-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-15T16:51:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-15T16:51:48Z-
dc.date.created2021-05-14-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/154562-
dc.description.abstractA desiccant enhanced evaporative (DEVap) cooling system has been introduced recently using at least vapor compression technology. The main components of the DEVap cooling system are a DEVap unit, a regenerator, a cooling coil and a reheating coil. This system is based on variable air volume system to deal with space load and it requires specific outdoor air intake strategies according to the outdoor air condition. The DEVap unit cools and dehumidifies the process air to control the room condition and cooling coil conducts extra cooling when the humidity ratio of the air is extremely high. A liquid desiccant and evaporative cooling-assisted 100% outdoor air system (LD-IDECOAS) which uses non vapor compression technology consists of a liquid desiccant, an indirect and a direct evaporative cooler and a sensible heat exchanger. The purpose of this research is to compare energy performance of the DEVap cooling system and applicability with those of the LDIDECOAS system by simulation in cooling season. The operating energy consumption will be estimated using TRNSYS 17 integrated with commercial equation solver (EES). In terms of fan energy consumption, LD-IDECOAS consumed 19% more energy because of pressure drop caused from each component compared with the VAV system. The DEVap cooling system consumed 46% more fan energy according to increased pressure drop and additional fans. For the regeneration of solution, the LDIDECOAS required 4 times more natural gas because it introduces 100% outdoor air in cooling season compared with the DEVap cooling system. As a results, the DEVap cooling system saved 84% and the LD-IDECOAS saved 71% of primary energy compared with the conventional VAV system.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherREHVA-
dc.titleEnergy Performance and Applicability Comparison of Two Different Types of Liquid Desiccant Assisted Evaporative Cooling Systems-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJeong, Jae Weon-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress, v.9, pp.1 - 10-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress-
dc.citation.titleCLIMA 2016 - proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress-
dc.citation.volume9-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.endPage10-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeProceeding-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassother-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLD-IDECOAS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorliquid desiccant-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornon-vapor compression-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorevaporative cooling-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/233778834/paper_397.pdf-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > 서울 건축공학부 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jeong, Jae Weon photo

Jeong, Jae Weon
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE