훼손지 유형에 따른 생태복원 평가방법 개발
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 최재용 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이상혁 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이솔애 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 지승용 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이상훈 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-15T18:23:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-15T18:23:48Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-3032 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/155090 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It was required to evaluate ecological restorations in a comprehensive way in order to systematically manage conservation areas such as DMZ and national parks in South Korea. In this research we developed a new approach to evaluating ecological restorations with more various indexes than vegetation covering-related indexes. By analyzing damaged areas in the vicinity of DMZ, major damaged types were identified as six classes: landform modification, surface loss, soil pollution, soil physio-chemical modification, vegetation decline and vegetation damaged. From literature review, 39 indexes were selected and were grouped into four divisions: soil property, vegetation growth & structure, habitat property and landscape structure & functions. By conducting a survey with the selected indexes targeting relevant experts, data on relative importance among the divisions and indexes by damaged type were collected. As a result, it was found that the orders and values of weighted values of the divisions were different by damaged type: for example, soil property (0.402), vegetation growth & structure (0.209), habitat property (0.225), landscape structure & function (0.163) for “landform modification”; but soil property (0.171), vegetation growth & structure (0.401), habitat property (0.270), landscape structure & function (0.158) for “vegetation decline”. Similarly, evaluation indexes showed different orders and values of relative importance, easiness in field measurement and representativeness for the division by damaged type, and the values were used for calculating importance factor for each index. In the evaluation table, score1 and score2 were made by the importance factors of indexes multiplied by distribution values which present grades and by the weighted values of divisions. In conclusion, while dealing with the damaged type was considered significant for evaluating and managing restorations, further tests on this table with a range of cases were needed to improve its quality. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한국환경복원기술학회 | - |
dc.title | 훼손지 유형에 따른 생태복원 평가방법 개발 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Evaluation Method Development for Ecological Restorations by Damaged Types | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이상훈 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.121 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국환경복원기술학회지, v.19, no.1, pp.121 - 133 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 한국환경복원기술학회지 | - |
dc.citation.title | 한국환경복원기술학회지 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 19 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 121 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 133 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | 정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함)) | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002086436 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Evaluation index | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Ecological restoration | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Landscape analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Sustainable monitoring | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Restoration management | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201609757436183.page | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.