Korean public's preference for supply security of oil and gas and the impact of protest bidders
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jihyo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jinsoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Yoon Kyung | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-15T18:30:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-15T18:30:30Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-12 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-4215 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/155169 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Korean governmental support for supply security of oil and gas via overseas exploration and production (E&P) projects are publicly criticized because of some poor projects lacking of economic feasibility, even though it should be expanded from a long-term perspective. Applying the contingent valuation, this study investigates the Korean public's preferences for governmental support for overseas oil and gas E&P projects. The result shows that the governmental support for overseas E&P projects rather decreases public utility. The primary reason behind this utility decrease is that some respondents protested to bid because of their resistance toward tax increase without guaranteeing the efficient government support. This result implies that simple tax increases for expansion of the governmental support may bring about public's strong opposition. In order to overcome this public opposition, this study suggests that it is necessary to arouse public understanding of the necessity of overseas oil and gas E&P projects. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | - |
dc.title | Korean public's preference for supply security of oil and gas and the impact of protest bidders | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Jinsoo | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.032 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84952878090 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000368746400019 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ENERGY POLICY, v.89, pp.202 - 213 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | ENERGY POLICY | - |
dc.citation.title | ENERGY POLICY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 89 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 202 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 213 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Energy & Fuels | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Energy & Fuels | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Studies | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONTINGENT VALUATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ENERGY SECURITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | POWER OUTAGES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FOSSIL-FUELS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ELECTRICITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HOUSEHOLDS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CHOICE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODELS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Supply security of oil and gas | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Overseas E& | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | P projects | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Public preference | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Contingent valuation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Protest response | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515302111?via%3Dihub | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.