환경적 footprint 분석을 통한 토양경작법과 화학적산화법의 비교
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김연수 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 임현숙 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박재우 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-15T22:15:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-15T22:15:09Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-13 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-6438 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/156974 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, land farming and chemical oxidation of a diesel-contaminated site is compared to evaluate the environmental impact during soil remediation using the Spreadsheet for Environmental Footprint Analysis by U.S. EPA. Each remediation process is divided into four phases, consisting of soil excavation, backfill and transportation (Phase 0), construction of remediation facility (Phase 1), remediation operation (Phase 2), and restoration of site and waste disposal (Phase 3). Environmental footprints, such as material use, energy consumption, air emission, water use and waste generation, are analyzed to find the way to minimize the environmental impact. In material use and waste generation, land farming has more environmental effect than chemical oxidation due to the concrete and backfill material used to construct land farming facility in Phase 1. Also, in energy use, land farming use about six times more energy than chemical oxidation because of cement production and fuel use of heavy machinery, such as backhoe and truck. However, carbon dioxide, commonly considered as important factor of environmental impact due to global warming effect, is emitted more in chemical oxidation because of hydrogen peroxide production. Water use of chemical oxidation is also 2.1 times higher than land farming. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한국지하수토양환경학회 | - |
dc.title | 환경적 footprint 분석을 통한 토양경작법과 화학적산화법의 비교 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Comparison of Land Farming and Chemical Oxidation based on Environmental Footprint Analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 박재우 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.3.007 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 지하수토양환경, v.20, no.3, pp.7 - 14 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 지하수토양환경 | - |
dc.citation.title | 지하수토양환경 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 7 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 14 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002009307 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Green remediation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Footprint analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Life cycle assessment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Land farming | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Chemical oxidation | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201525961515129.page | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.