Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The impact of iodinated contrast agent administered during preoperative computed tomography scan on body iodine pool in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer preparing for radioactive iodine treatment.

Authors
Sohn, Seo YoungChoi, Ji HunKim, Na KyungJoung, Ji YoungCho, Yoon YoungPark, Sun MiKim, Tae HunJin, Sang ManBae, Ji CheolLee, Soo YounChung, Jae HoonKim, Sun Wook
Issue Date
May-2014
Publisher
MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
Citation
THYROID, v.24, no.5, pp.872 - 877
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
THYROID
Volume
24
Number
5
Start Page
872
End Page
877
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/159957
DOI
10.1089/thy.2013.0238
ISSN
1050-7256
Abstract
Background: Iodine in iodinated contrast agents (ICAs) interferes with radioactive iodine treatment (RAIT) and diagnostic scans in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) because it can compete with I-131. Published guidelines recommend delaying RAIT for three to four months in patients who have been exposed to ICA. Spot urinary iodine concentration is a useful marker to reflect the body iodine pool. We investigated the impact of ICAs administered at preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan on the body iodine pool to determine the proper time interval between preoperative CT and RAIT in DTC patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 1023 patients with DTC who underwent a preoperative CT scan with ICA, total thyroidectomy, and one week of low-iodine diet in preparation for RAIT. Urine iodine excretion (UIE) was measured in spot urine by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and reported both in simple concentration (g/L) and divided by gram creatinine (g/gCr). Patients were divided into five groups by time interval in days between preoperative CT scan and spot urine iodine measurement (A, 31-60 [n=29]; B, 61-90 [n=155]; C, 91-120 [n=546]; D, 121-150 [n=226]; E, 151-180 [n=67]). Results: The median (interquartile range) of UIE (g/gCr) in each group was 44.4 (27.7-73.2) in group A, 33.3 (22.8-64.7) in group B, 32.7 (20.8-63.0) in group C, 32.0 (20.6-67.0) in group D, and 30.4 (19.6-70.8) in group E. There was no significant difference between group A and the remaining groups (p>0.05) Also, the proportion of patients who achieved the appropriate UIE for RAIT according to our hospital's cutoff (66.2g/gCr) was not different between groups (A, 72.4%; B, 76.1%; C, 77.5%; D, 74.8%; E, 74.6%) (p=0.78). Conclusion: This study shows that a UIE of one month after preoperative CT scan with ICA was not higher than that of six months after CT scan in patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for DTC. Thus, current guidelines that recommend delay of RAIT for three to four months after CT scan with ICA should be revisited and future studies to clarify the appropriate time interval between CT scan with ICA and RAIT are warranted.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 교육협력지원교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Sohn, Seo Young photo

Sohn, Seo Young
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL COOPERATION)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE