민사적 구제수단(私的執行)의 행정·형사적 구제수단(公的執行)에 대한 비교우위
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김차동 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-16T06:46:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-16T06:46:46Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-13 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-228X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/161039 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A right can be defined as a legally protected interest. What kinds of protection shall be given to the right? Lawyers reply to the question that it is a remedy. Law and economists reply to the question indicating two rules, that are property rule and liability rule. Property rule is considered as basic protection to the right. To the very exceptional cases, liability rule can be applied. Under property rule, infringement to the right must be enjoined by injunctive reliefs. As legal systems have been evolved, direct prevention has been refrained and replaced by sanctions. Sanctions are originated with an idea of retribution. But they are frequently used to deter infringement. We can find a lot of sanctions such as damages, administrative fines, surcharges, fines, imprisonment and etc. Such sanctions are categorized as private, administrative, and criminal ones. Nowadays, the Korean Supreme Court and Korean Constitutional Court have opinions that private sanctions can not be substituted by administrative or criminal ones and vice versa. But, law and economists have different opinions. They frequently wrote several papers on the substitutability among the three remedies. In a certain circumstance, private law enforcement has comparative advantage against public law enforcement including administrative and criminal ones. Here are a list of considerations on the comparative advantage such as costs, incentives, policy and procedure of law enforcement. There is not an absolute solution on the issue but only second best solution. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한양대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.title | 민사적 구제수단(私的執行)의 행정·형사적 구제수단(公的執行)에 대한 비교우위 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Study on Comparative Advantage of Private Law Enforcement against Public Law Enforcement | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김차동 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 법학논총, v.31, no.1, pp.447 - 470 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 법학논총 | - |
dc.citation.title | 법학논총 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 31 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 447 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 470 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001865981 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사적집행 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공적집행 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 비교우위 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 금지청구 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 손해배상 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 과징금 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 벌금 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 징역형 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | private enforcement | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | public enforcement | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | comparative advantage | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | injunction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | damages | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | surcharge | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | fine | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | imprisonment | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001865981 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.