Clinical Outcomes of Rhythm Control Strategies for Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation According to the Quality-of-Life Score: The CODE-AF (Comparison Study of Drugs for Symptom Control and Complication Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation) Registry

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes; appropriate rhythm control can reduce the incidence of these adverse events. Therefore, catheter ablation is recommended in symptomatic patients with AF. The aims of this study were to compare AF‐related outcomes according to a baseline symptom scale score and to determine the best treatment strategy for asymptomatic patients with AF.

Methods and Results This study enrolled all patients who completed a baseline Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality‐of‐Life (AFEQT) survey in a prospective observational registry. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to AFEQT score at baseline; scores ≤80 were defined as symptomatic, whereas scores >80 represented asymptomatic patients. The primary outcome was defined as a composite of hospitalization for heart failure, ischemic stroke, or cardiac death. This study included 1515 patients (mean age: 65.7±10.5 years; 998 [65.9%] men). The survival curve showed a poorer outcome in the symptomatic group compared with the asymptomatic group (log‐rank P=0.04). Rhythm control led to a significantly lower risk of a composite outcome in asymptomatic patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.27–0.84], P=0.01). Rhythm control was associated with more favorable composite outcomes in the asymptomatic group with paroxysmal AF, left atrium diameter ≤50 mm, and CHA2DS2‐VASc score ≥3.

Conclusions Symptomatic patients with AF experienced more adverse outcomes compared with asymptomatic patients. In asymptomatic patients with AF, a strategy of rhythm control improved the outcomes, especially with paroxysmal AF, smaller left atrium size, or higher stroke risk.