Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effects of initial position versus prominence in English

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorCho, Taehong-
dc.contributor.authorKeating, Patricia-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T20:35:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-20T20:35:24Z-
dc.date.issued2009-10-
dc.identifier.issn0095-4470-
dc.identifier.issn1095-8576-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/176090-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates effects of three prosodic factors-prosodic boundary (Utterance-initial vs. Utterance-medial), lexical stress (primary vs. secondary) and phrasal accent (accented vs. unaccented)-on articulatory and acoustic realizations of word-initial CVs (/n epsilon/, /t epsilon/) in trisyllabic English words. The consonantal measures were linguopalatal Peak contact and Release contacts (by electropalatography), Seal duration, Nasal duration and Nasal energy for /n/, VOT, RMS burst energy and spectral Center of Gravity at the release for /t/; and the vocalic measures were linguopalatal Vowel contact, Vowel F1, Vowel duration and Vowel amplitude. Several specific points emerge. Firstly, domain-initial articulation is differentiated front stress- or accent-induced articulations along several measures. Secondly, the vowel is effectively louder domain-initially, suggesting that the boundary effect is not strictly local to the initial consonant. Thirdly, some accentual effects can be seen in secondary-stressed syllables, suggesting that accentual influences spread beyond the primary-stressed syllable. Finally, unlike domain-initial effects, prominence effects are not cumulative. Thus we conclude that, at least for the kind of word-initial syllables tested here, different aspects of prosodic structure (domain boundary vs. prominence) are differentially encoded.-
dc.format.extent20-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherAcademic Press-
dc.titleEffects of initial position versus prominence in English-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-70350205593-
dc.identifier.wosid000271438100008-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Phonetics, v.37, no.4, pp 466 - 485-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Phonetics-
dc.citation.volume37-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage466-
dc.citation.endPage485-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaLinguistics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryLinguistics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryLanguage & Linguistics-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTATISTICAL-ANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROSODIC BOUNDARY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAMERICAN ENGLISH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRESS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSPEECH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDUTCH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusARTICULATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDURATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOMAIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERCEPTION-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447009000497?via%3Dihub-
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 인문과학대학 > 서울 영어영문학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Cho, Tae hong photo

Cho, Tae hong
COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES (DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE