류마티스 인자 측정의 가장 우수한 방법은?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 민도식 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 전래희 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김신규 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-21T11:48:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-21T11:48:36Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-09-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2093-940X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/181663 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Rheumatoid factor (RF) is used as one of the criteria for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nephelometers are widely used in laboratories to quantitatively measure RF. In nephelometric ways of measurement, there are endpoint nephelometry and rate nephelometry. BN II System (BN II) (Dade Behring Marburg GmbH, USA) is a well known endpoint nephelometer while IMMAGE System (IMMAGE) (Beckman Coulter, USA) is a well known rate nephelometer. We compared these two automatic nephelometric analyzers to evaluate which method shows the best results. Methods: We measured RF (n=195) using the two machines. We evaluated the correlation between BN II and IMMAGE. We compared the results of BN II with those of IMMAGE in terms of interference and clinical usefulness. Results: The correlation coefficient (r) of RF was 0.9310 (p<0.0001). We could not find any significant interference for BN II with high concentration of triglyceride or bilirubin, but IMMAGE showed significant interferences with high concentrations of triglyceride and bilirubin. The sensitivity and specificity of BN II for the diagnosis of RA were 90.3% and 82.4%. Those of IMMAGE were 86.1% and 74.5%. Conclusion: BN II was enough to satisfy the analytical features and it showed better results than IMMAGE. We expect BN II, the endpoint nephelometer, to be the best equipment in measuring RF for diagnosis of RA. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 대한류마티스학회 | - |
dc.title | 류마티스 인자 측정의 가장 우수한 방법은? | - |
dc.title.alternative | What is the Best Method in Measuring Rheumatoid Factors? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 전래희 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 대한류마티스학회지, v.13, no.1, pp.26 - 32 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 대한류마티스학회지 | - |
dc.citation.title | 대한류마티스학회지 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 13 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 26 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 32 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001154391 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Rheumatoid factor | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nephelometry | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Rheumatoid factor | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nephelometry | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://kiss16.kstudy.com/kiss61/download_viewer.asp | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.