Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Prasugrel dose de-escalation in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS trial

Authors
Lee, Kyu-SunPark, Keun-HoPark, Kyung WooRha, Seung-WoonHwang, DoyeonKang, JeehoonHan, Jung-KyuYang, Han-MoKang, Hyun-JaeKoo, Bon-KwonLee, Nam-hoRhew, Jay YoungChun, Kook JinLim, Young-HyoBong, Jung MinBae, Jang-WhanLee, Bong KiKim, Seok-YeonShin, Won-YongLim, Hong-SeokPark, KyungilKim, Hyo-Soo
Issue Date
Apr-2023
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Keywords
Acute coronary syndrome; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Prasugrel; De-escalation; Diabetes mellitus
Citation
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, v.9, no.3, pp.262 - 270
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume
9
Number
3
Start Page
262
End Page
270
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/185749
DOI
10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad008
ISSN
2055-6837
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results This was a post-hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases-Comparison of Reduction of Prasugrel Dose or Polymer Technology in ACS Patients) randomized trial. The efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy (prasugrel 5 mg daily) were compared with conventional therapy (prasugrel 10 mg daily) in patients with DM. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), clinically driven revascularization, stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) class >= 2 bleeding events. The secondary ischaemic outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, ST, or ischaemic stroke. Of 2338 patients randomized, 990 had DM. The primary endpoint of NACE occurred in 38 patients (7.6%) receiving prasugrel dose de-escalation and in 53 patients (11.3%) receiving conventional therapy among patients with DM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.99; P = 0.049]. Prasugrel dose de-escalation as compared with conventional therapy did not increase the risk of ischaemic events (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56-1.88; P = 0.927) but decreased BARC class >= 2 bleeding in patients with DM (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.84; P = 0.012). Conclusion Prasugrel dose de-escalation compared with conventional therapy may reduce the risk of net clinical outcomes, mostly driven by a reduction in bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients with DM.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lim, Young-Hyo photo

Lim, Young-Hyo
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE