Prasugrel dose de-escalation in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS trial
- Authors
- Lee, Kyu-Sun; Park, Keun-Ho; Park, Kyung Woo; Rha, Seung-Woon; Hwang, Doyeon; Kang, Jeehoon; Han, Jung-Kyu; Yang, Han-Mo; Kang, Hyun-Jae; Koo, Bon-Kwon; Lee, Nam-ho; Rhew, Jay Young; Chun, Kook Jin; Lim, Young-Hyo; Bong, Jung Min; Bae, Jang-Whan; Lee, Bong Ki; Kim, Seok-Yeon; Shin, Won-Yong; Lim, Hong-Seok; Park, Kyungil; Kim, Hyo-Soo
- Issue Date
- Apr-2023
- Publisher
- OXFORD UNIV PRESS
- Keywords
- Acute coronary syndrome; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Prasugrel; De-escalation; Diabetes mellitus
- Citation
- EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, v.9, no.3, pp.262 - 270
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY
- Volume
- 9
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 262
- End Page
- 270
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/185749
- DOI
- 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad008
- ISSN
- 2055-6837
- Abstract
- Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods and results This was a post-hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases-Comparison of Reduction of Prasugrel Dose or Polymer Technology in ACS Patients) randomized trial. The efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy (prasugrel 5 mg daily) were compared with conventional therapy (prasugrel 10 mg daily) in patients with DM. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), clinically driven revascularization, stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) class >= 2 bleeding events. The secondary ischaemic outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, ST, or ischaemic stroke. Of 2338 patients randomized, 990 had DM. The primary endpoint of NACE occurred in 38 patients (7.6%) receiving prasugrel dose de-escalation and in 53 patients (11.3%) receiving conventional therapy among patients with DM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.99; P = 0.049]. Prasugrel dose de-escalation as compared with conventional therapy did not increase the risk of ischaemic events (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56-1.88; P = 0.927) but decreased BARC class >= 2 bleeding in patients with DM (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.84; P = 0.012).
Conclusion Prasugrel dose de-escalation compared with conventional therapy may reduce the risk of net clinical outcomes, mostly driven by a reduction in bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients with DM.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.