Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Is the immediate blood pressure control using parenteral antihypertensive drug needed for patients with severe high blood pressure with epistaxis in the emergency department?

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShin, Kyunghoon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kyunghoon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Heekyung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Changsun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Laurie Seiwon-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Ji Won-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-01T07:15:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-01T07:15:59Z-
dc.date.created2023-05-03-
dc.date.issued2022-10-
dc.identifier.issn1226-4334-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/185983-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to assess whether the conventional treatments administered in the emergency department (ED) for hypertensive urgencies (observed or peroral [PO]-controlled) in severe high blood pressure (BP) patients with epistaxis increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and the mortality rate as compared to immediate BP control using intravenous (IV) antihypertensive medication Methods: A retrospective study over 7 years was conducted at the ED of a tertiary university hospital. Among adult patients with spontaneous epistaxis, subjects with severe high BP (systolic BP ≥180 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥120 mmHg) were included in the study. Participants were divided into three groups determined by the methods used to control BP: non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups. The incidence of epistaxis recurrence and mortality rate within 6 months were compared. Results: Among the 380 patients enrolled, 238 were discharged from the ED without any pharmacological antihypertensive treatment (non-controlled group), 83 received PO antihypertensive medication (PO-controlled group), and 59 received IV antihypertensive medication (IV-controlled group). Of these, 29 (12.2%), nine (10.8%), and seven (11.9%) patients from the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively, experienced epistaxis recurrence within 24 hours, which was statistically not different among the three groups (P=0.948). The 6-month mortality rates were determined to be 0.8%, 2.4%, and 3.4% in the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively. The difference was also not significant among the groups (P=0.294). Conclusion: The conventional treatments of hypertensive urgencies (observed or PO-controlled) in patients with severe high BP with epistaxis in the ED did not increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and short-term mortality rate when compared to immediate BP control using IV antihypertensive medication.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher대한응급의학회-
dc.titleIs the immediate blood pressure control using parenteral antihypertensive drug needed for patients with severe high blood pressure with epistaxis in the emergency department?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Heekyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Changsun-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation대한응급의학회지, v.33, no.5, pp.471 - 479-
dc.relation.isPartOf대한응급의학회지-
dc.citation.title대한응급의학회지-
dc.citation.volume33-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage471-
dc.citation.endPage479-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART002893732-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEpistaxis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSevere high blood pressure-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHypertensive crisis-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://kiss.kstudy.com/Detail/Ar?key=3978712-
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 응급의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Chang sun photo

Kim, Chang sun
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE