Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Which innovation type is better for production efficiency? A comparison between product/ service, process, organisational and marketing innovations using stochastic frontier and metafrontier analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Keungoui-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Junmin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Changjun-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-24T10:03:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-24T10:03:08Z-
dc.date.created2023-05-30-
dc.date.issued2023-01-
dc.identifier.issn0953-7325-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/187568-
dc.description.abstractInnovation has been recognised as essential in a firm's success, but not all firms can actively engage in innovation activities due to their limited resources and the potential risks involved in such activities. In such a situation, a better understanding of the difference in the effects of the different innovation types is needed. However, little is known about the differences in technical efficiency in terms of innovation types. This study compared technical efficiency across different firms that applied different production function technologies differentiated by innovation type. Data from the seventh version of the Workplace Panel Survey of the Korean Labor Institute was used. Manufacturing firms that adopted a single innovation type were included in the final sample, based on the results of an exploratory data analysis. Using stochastic frontier analysis, the efficiencies of the four groups were estimated, and the efficiencies of different production function technologies were compared using meta-frontier analysis. The estimation results indicate that the organisation innovation group showed better efficiency than other groups, while the product/service innovation group exhibited the highest potential in its production technology.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCarfax Publishing Ltd.-
dc.titleWhich innovation type is better for production efficiency? A comparison between product/ service, process, organisational and marketing innovations using stochastic frontier and metafrontier analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Changjun-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09537325.2021.1965979-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85112401957-
dc.identifier.wosid000684742900001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationTechnology Analysis and Strategic Management, v.35, no.1, pp.59 - 72-
dc.relation.isPartOfTechnology Analysis and Strategic Management-
dc.citation.titleTechnology Analysis and Strategic Management-
dc.citation.volume35-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage59-
dc.citation.endPage72-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docType정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함))-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaBusiness & Economics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaScience & Technology - Other Topics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryManagement-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMultidisciplinary Sciences-
dc.subject.keywordPlusABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSERVICE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPACT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANTECEDENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusORIENTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTECHNOLOGY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFIRMS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInnovation type-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormeta-frontier analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorstochastic frontier analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortechnical efficiency-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorworkplace panel survey-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09537325.2021.1965979-
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE