Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based triple antiplatelet therapy compared with clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial

Authors
Park, SoohyungRha, Seung-WoonChoi, Byoung GeolKim, WoohyeunChoi, Woong GilLee, Seung JinLee, Jae BeomPark, Ji YoungPark, Sang MinJeong, Myung HoKim, Yong HoonHer, Ae-YoungKim, Min WoongChen, Kang-YinKim, Bae KeunShin, Eun-SeokSeo, Jae-BinAhn, JihunChoi, Se YeonByun, Jae KyeongCha, Jin AhHyun, Su JinChoi, Cheol UngPark, Chang Gyu
Issue Date
Nov-2023
Publisher
Mosby Inc.
Citation
American Heart Journal, v.265, pp 11 - 21
Pages
11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
American Heart Journal
Volume
265
Start Page
11
End Page
21
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/191293
DOI
10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.015
ISSN
0002-8703
1097-6744
Abstract
Background: Previous studies reported that compared to conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin + clopidogrel), triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT), involving the addition of cilostazol to DAT, had better clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the optimal duration of TAT is yet to be determined. Methods: In total, 985 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) were prospectively enrolled in 15 PCI centers in South Korea and China. We randomly assigned patients into 3 groups: DAT (aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months), TAT 1M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 1 month), and TAT 6M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 6 months). The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. Results: The primary endpoint did not differ among the 3 groups (8.8% in DAT, 11.0% in TAT 1M, and 11.6% in TAT 6M; hazard ratio for TAT 1M vs DAT, 1.302; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.792-2.141; P = .297; hazard ratio for TAT 6M vs DAT, 1.358; 95% CI, 0.829-2.225; P = .225). With respect to in-hospital outcomes, more bleeding events occurred in the TAT group than in the DAT group (1.3% vs 4.7% vs 2.6%, P = .029), with no significant differences in major bleeding events. Additionally, the TAT group had a higher incidence of headaches (0% vs 1.6% vs 2.6%, P = .020). Conclusions: The addition of cilostazol to DAT did not reduce the incidence of 1-year MACEs compared with DAT alone. Instead, it may be associated with an increased risk of drug intolerance and side effects, including in-hospital bleeding and headaches.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Woo hyeun photo

Kim, Woo hyeun
서울 의과대학 (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE