Tip-in Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Flat Colorectal Neoplasia 10mm or Larger in Size
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Noh, Soo Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jin Yong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jae Cheol | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Eun Hye | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jeongseok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ham, Nam Seok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, Sung Wook | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Sang Hyoung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ye, Byong Duk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Byeon, Jeong-Sik | - |
dc.contributor.author | Myung, Seung-Jae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Suk-Kyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Dong-Hoon | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-26T10:07:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-26T10:07:00Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2023-07-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0179-1958 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/191428 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose A modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique, Tip-in EMR, was recently introduced to enhance the complete resection of colorectal neoplasia (CRN). We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of Tip-in EMR for flat CRNs. Methods From January to September 2018, conventional or Tip-in EMR was consecutively performed for 112 flat CRNs >= 10 mm in diameter. Tip-in EMR was performed when en bloc snaring was impossible with conventional EMR or when a lesion was inadequately lifted owing to a previous forceps biopsy. We retrospectively collected the clinical, procedural, and histologic data of the conventional and Tip-in EMR groups and compared the en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and complications between the two groups. Results Among 112 flat CRNs of 80 patients, conventional EMR and Tip-in EMR were performed for 74 and 38 lesions, respectively. The median lesion size was 12 (10-27) mm. Tip-in EMR was superior to conventional EMR in terms of en bloc resection (94.7% vs. 77.0%, p = 0.018) and histologic complete resection (76.3% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.022). There was no difference in postprocedural bleeding between the two groups; however, overall adverse events, including bleeding and postpolypectomy electrocoagulation syndrome, were more frequent in the Tip-in EMR group. Conclusions Tip-in EMR is a feasible technique for flat colorectal lesions >= 10 mm and is superior to conventional EMR with respect to en bloc and complete resection rates. The safety profiles of Tip-in EMR and conventional EMR should be compared via large-scale prospective studies. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.title | Tip-in Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Flat Colorectal Neoplasia 10mm or Larger in Size | - |
dc.title.alternative | Tip-in versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for flat colorectal neoplasia 10 mm or larger in size | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Oh, Eun Hye | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00384-020-03604-z | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85083966606 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000529469000001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, v.35, no.7, pp.1283 - 1290 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE | - |
dc.citation.title | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 35 | - |
dc.citation.number | 7 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1283 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1290 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | 정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함)) | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INCOMPLETE POLYP RESECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SESSILE SERRATED POLYPS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INCISION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COLONOSCOPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RISK | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EMR | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Colon | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Rectum | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Endoscopic mucosal resection | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Neoplasm | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00384-020-03604-z?utm_source=getftr&utm_medium=getftr&utm_campaign=getftr_pilot | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1365
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.