Cited 0 time in
Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students: precepted review versus peer discussion
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Park, Kye-Yeung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang, Ye Ji | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Park, Hoon-Ki | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hwang, Hwan-Sik | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-28T08:27:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-28T08:27:43Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1087-2981 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1087-2981 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/195112 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Video-recordings review of patient encounters is reported to improve the clinical performance of medical students. However, evidence on specific remediation strategies or outcomes are lacking. We aimed to implement videorecording-based remediation of standardized patient encounters among medical students, combined with preceptor one-on-one feedback or peer group discussion, and evaluate the effectiveness of the two remediation methods using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Methods: Following standardized patient encounters, 107 final-year medical students were divided into two groups based on different remediation methods of video review: (1) precepted video review with preceptor feedback (N = 55) and (2) private video review and subsequent peer group discussion under supervision (N = 52). All students underwent twelve-stations of OSCE both before and after the video review. Students' pre- and post-remediation OSCE scores, self-efficacy level in patient encounters, and level of educational satisfaction with each method were assessed and compared between different video-based remediation methods to evaluate their respective effects. Results: After remediation, the total and subcomponent OSCE scores, such as history taking, physical examination, and patient - physician interaction (PPI), among all students increased significantly. Post-remediation OSCE scores showed no significant difference between two remediation methods (preceptor module, 79.6 +/- 4.3 vs. peer module, 79.4 +/- 3.8 in the total OSCE score). Students' self-efficacy levels increased after remediation in both modules (both p-value <0.001), with no difference between the two modules. However, students' satisfaction level was higher in the preceptor module than in the peer module (80.1 +/- 17.7 vs. 59.2 +/- 25.1, p-value <0.001). Among students with poor baseline OSCE performance, a prominent increase in PPI scores was observed in the preceptor-based module. Conclusion: Video-based remediation of patient encounters, either through preceptor review with one-on-one feedback or through private review with peer discussion, was equally effective in improving the OSCE scores and self-efficacy levels of medical students. Underperforming students can benefit from precepted video reviews for building PPI. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 8 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Co-Action Publishing | - |
| dc.title | Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students: precepted review versus peer discussion | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10872981.2024.2392428 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85201543876 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 001293338300001 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Medical Education Online, v.29, no.1, pp 1 - 8 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Medical Education Online | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 29 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 8 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Review | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Education & Educational Research | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Education & Educational Research | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | WORKPLACE-BASED ASSESSMENT | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | CLINICAL SKILLS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SELF-ASSESSMENT | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | FEEDBACK | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | REMEDIATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | PERCEPTIONS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | EDUCATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SCHOOL | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | OSCE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Feedback | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | objective structured clinical examination | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | peer | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | preceptor | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | remediation | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | video | - |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10872981.2024.2392428 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1366
COPYRIGHT © 2024 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
