Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Two-Step Incision for Periarterial Sympathectomy of the Handopen access

Authors
Jeon, Seung BaeAhn, Hee ChangAhn, Yong SuChoi, Matthew Seung Suk
Issue Date
Nov-2015
Publisher
KOREAN SOC PLASTIC & RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Keywords
Raynaud disease; Sympathectomy
Citation
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, v.42, no.6, pp 761 - 768
Pages
8
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS
Volume
42
Number
6
Start Page
761
End Page
768
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/202617
DOI
10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.761
ISSN
2234-6163
2234-6171
Abstract
Background Surgical scars on the palmar surface of the hand may lead to functional and also aesthetic and psychological consequences. The objective of this study was to introduce a new incision technique for periarterial sympathectomy of the hand and to compare the results of the new two-step incision technique with those of a Koman incision by using an objective questionnaire. Methods A total of 40 patients (17 men and 23 women) with intractable Raynaud's disease or syndrome underwent surgery in our hospital, conducted by a single surgeon, between January 2008 and January 2013. Patients who had undergone extended sympathectomy or vessel graft were excluded. Clinical evaluation of postoperative scars was performed in both groups one year after surgery using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and the Wake Forest University rating scale. Results The total patient score was 8.59 (range, 6-15) in the two-step incision group and 9.62 (range, 7-18) in the Koman incision group. A significant difference was found between the groups in the total PS score (P-value=0.034) but not in the total observer score. Our analysis found no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative Wake Forest University rating scale scores between the two-step and Koman incision groups. The time required for recovery prior to returning to work after surgery was shorter in the two-step incision group, with a mean of 29.48 days in the two-step incision group and 34.15 days in the Koman incision group (P=0.03). Conclusions Compared to the Koman incision, the new two-step incision technique provides better aesthetic results, similar symptom improvement, and a reduction in the recovery time required before returning to work. Furthermore, this incision allows the surgeon to access a wide surgical field and a sufficient exposure of anatomical structures.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 성형외과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE