Cited 0 time in
Preference for On-Demand Fexuprazan Therapy in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Jung, Byung Wook | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Park, Chan Hyuk | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Eun, Chang Soo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-27T02:30:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-27T02:30:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4426 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4426 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/219652 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Maintenance therapy is crucial in managing and preventing symptom relapse in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), with continuous and on-demand therapy being the common approaches. However, maintenance therapy using potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), such as fexuprazan, remains incompletely evaluated. Methods: This single-center, single-arm, prospective cohort study enrolled individuals with weekly heartburn or acid regurgitation and confirmed erosive esophagitis. The participants received 40 mg fexuprazan daily for 4 weeks as initial therapy, followed by 4 weeks of maintenance therapy. Patients chose either continuous or on-demand therapy for maintenance, according to their preference. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients selecting on-demand therapy. The symptom scores were assessed using the GERD questionnaire (GERD-Q) and patient assessment of upper-gastrointestinal-disorders symptoms questionnaire (PAGI-SYM). Results: The 31 included participants showed a significant reduction in symptom scores after initial treatment (baseline vs. 4-week: GERD-Q, 9.0 vs. 6.5, p < 0.001; PAGI-SYM, 29.0 vs. 10.8, p < 0.001). Twenty-one (67.7%) patients chose on-demand therapy after initial treatment. The symptom scores did not differ significantly before and after maintenance therapy (4-week vs. 8-week: GERD-Q, 6.5 vs. 6.0, p = 0.225; PAGI-SYM, 10.8 vs. 9.0, p = 0.354). Although this relation was not significant, patients experiencing larger decreases in symptom scores tended to prefer on-demand therapy. After maintenance therapy, the symptom scores did not differ between continuous and on-demand therapy (GERD-Q, 5.3 vs. 6.3, p = 0.342; PAGI-SYM, 9.4 vs. 8.8, p = 0.611). Conclusions: Fexuprazan was effective as an initial and maintenance therapy in patients with GERD who showed typical symptoms. Approximately 68% of the patients preferred on-demand therapy as a maintenance treatment. Based on the patient’s preference for maintenance therapy, symptom control did not differ between continuous and on-demand therapy. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 11 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | MDPI AG | - |
| dc.title | Preference for On-Demand Fexuprazan Therapy in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 스위스 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jpm15010019 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85215802373 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Personalized Medicine, v.15, no.1, pp 1 - 11 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Journal of Personalized Medicine | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 15 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 11 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | fexuprazan | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | fexuprazan | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | gastroesophageal reflux disease | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | maintenance therapy | - |
| dc.identifier.url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/15/1/19 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea+82-2-2220-1366
COPYRIGHT © 2024 HANYANG UNIVERSITY.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
