Detailed Information

Cited 11 time in webofscience Cited 11 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Minji-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yun-Hee-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Chang-Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung-Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chang-hyun-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Won Hyuk-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ahee-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T18:27:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-02T18:27:23Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-
dc.identifier.issn0304-3940-
dc.identifier.issn1872-7972-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/25670-
dc.description.abstractTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) non-invasively modulates brain function by inducing neuronal excitability. The conventional hot spot for inducing the highest current density in the hand motor area may not be the optimal site for effective stimulation. In this study, we investigated the influence of the center position of the anodal electrode on changes in motor cortical excitability. We considered three tDCS conditions in 16 healthy subjects: (i) real stimulation with the anodal electrode located at the conventional hand motor hot spot determined by motor evoked potentials (MEPs); (ii) real stimulation with the anodal electrode located at the point with the highest current density in the hand motor area as determined by electric current simulation; and (iii) sham stimulation. Motor cortical excitability as measured by MEP amplitude increased after both real stimulation conditions, but not after sham stimulation. Stimulation using the simulation-derived anodal electrode position, which was found to be posterior to the MEP hot spot for all subjects, induced higher motor cortical excitability. Individual positioning of the anodal electrode, based on the consideration of anatomical differences between subjects, appears to be important for maximizing the effects of tDCS. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.format.extent4-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherElsevier BV-
dc.titleWhat is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location아일랜드-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.052-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84918814241-
dc.identifier.wosid000347579000065-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNeuroscience Letters, v.584, pp 347 - 350-
dc.citation.titleNeuroscience Letters-
dc.citation.volume584-
dc.citation.startPage347-
dc.citation.endPage350-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaNeurosciences & Neurology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryNeurosciences-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTROKE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREHABILITATION-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMotor cortical excitability-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorElectric current density-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394014008647?via%3Dihub-
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 공과대학 > ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Im, Chang Hwan photo

Im, Chang Hwan
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING (서울 바이오메디컬공학전공)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE